| Wed, Dec 16 2009 05:54pm GMT 1 |

EmmaD
1801 Posts
|
A SECRET ALCHEMY
Emma Darwin
From the reviews:
"Powerful and utterly convincing." - Daily Mail
"There is historical fiction - and there is historical
fiction. Anyone can dust down a set of fusty old names, chuck in a
few mead-fuelled brawls and the odd syphilitic courtesan and be
done with it. It takes real skill - and devotion - to bring
characters blurred by the passage of time into focus, to breathe
real life into them, to make their existence tangible to the
21st-century mind. In A Secret Alchemy, Emma Darwin has
managed such sorcery... Spellbinding." - The Times
Publishers' Description:
Two murdered princes; a powerful queen betrayed; a nobleman riding
towards his certain death... The story of the Princes in the Tower
has been one of the most fascinating - and most brutal - murder
mysteries in history for more than five hundred years. In a
brilliant feat of historical daring, Emma Darwin has recreated the
terrible, exhilarating world of the two youngest victims of the War
of the Roses: the power struggles and passion that lay behind their
birth, the danger into which they fell, the profoundly moving days
before their imprisonment, and the ultimate betrayal of their
innocence.
In A Secret Alchemy, three voices speak: that of Elizabeth
Woodville, the beautiful widow of King Edward IV; of her brother
Anthony, surrogate father to the doomed Prince Edward and his
brother Dickon; and that of present-day historian Una Pryor.
Orphaned, and herself brought up in a family where secrets and
rivalries threaten her world, Una's experience of tragedy, betrayal
and lost love help her unlock the long-buried secrets that led to
the princes' deaths.
Weaving their stories together, Emma Darwin brilliantly evokes how
the violence and glamour of past ages live on within our
present.
A Secret Alchemy has been named one of The Times
Best Paperbacks of 2009
|
|
| Wed, Dec 16 2009 07:03pm GMT 2 |

Weens
993 Posts
|
You are getting buried in plaudits. This is another I shall have to
buy after Christmas. If you would kindly write another that will be
ready for when I finish your current two, I would be grateful, lol.
Well done again Emma. There is no doubt about it, you can write
extremely well.
|
|
| Wed, Dec 16 2009 10:21pm GMT 3 |

AlanP
299 Posts
|
Sorry, I read this ages ago. Rather good, I thought. You'll have to
write another.
I also live v close to where much of the tale is set. I even went
out checking your geography.
|
|
| Sat, Dec 19 2009 06:00pm GMT 4 |

John Taylor
891 Posts
|
A Secret Alchemy appeals to both the heart and the head. It's a
fantastic read, but also poses, and in it's own substance, answers
some interesting questions. I came to the novel expecting, 'What
happened to the princes in the tower?' but this is scratching the
surface. One question is implied by one of the narrators, 'Why
fictionalise past events?' The reader participates in three lives,
and therein lies the answer.
Thank you, Emma.
|
|
| Mon, Dec 21 2009 10:28am GMT 5 |

EmmaD
1801 Posts
|
|
|
| Wed, Jan 5 2011 08:06pm GMT 6 |

Caducean Whisks
1120 Posts
|
Hi Emma,
I've just finished this - and enjoyed it very much. You've created
an atmosphere of the 1400s such that I really felt the instability
of kingship, the tenuous hold on life, and a real sense of history
- and on-going human emotions, which ultimately aren't so very
different.
That period is a bit of a black hole for me - names, dates, battles
- without anything to clothe them with - until now; but at last
it's stuck - just watch out, Mastermind!
Mini-micro grumble that in the historical story, I didn't know
where the places were until very late on - they were often riding
to/from London - in which direction??? I imagined them around
Cambridge and Norfolk, the Cotswolds, East Anglia, Oxford-ish - and
only latterly realised they were Northhampton-ish.
As for the present day story - I'm happily familiar with the
locations but have never visited them - now I have a reason to, and
it will mean something to me.
Back to the past - I was astonished that a king's marriage could be
in secret, but I suppose the nature of kings was very different. I
was touched by Anthony's story - riding to his death - and his
certainty in the afterlife made me wistful. And your solution for
the missing princes sounds entirely plausible; as was the aftermath
for Elysabeth, which was so moving. That Nasty Richard III - how
could he?
How on earth do you do your research? And did Anthony's letter
(that Una found) really exist? And where, exactly, is The Chantry?
Did they get funding to restore it and do they do open days?
There was some delightful writing; one description that stays with
me? Her skin shivered.
Thoroughly good read, and rare for me these days, so well done and
thank you.
Whisks
P.S. Stephen Fairhurst (from TMOL) pitches up again - albeit in a
whole different guise and 3-400 years before the TMOL soldier - but
thoroughly believable and engrossing. Do you have a cunning plan to
plant him in all your novels? Perhaps come out with a flourish some
years down the line, and write on the heredity and genealogy and
incarnations of Stephen Fairhurst?
|
|
| Wed, Jan 5 2011 09:59pm GMT 7 |

EmmaD
1801 Posts
|
Hi Whisks - I'm so glad you enjoyed it, and thank you for bothering
with such a lovely appreciation. With one novel about to go out
(eek!) , and another I'm about to start (help!), it's nice to be
reminded that I have got it right in the past, once or
twice...
It is a fiendishly complicated period, and it was a real challenge
to keep the reader understanding what and why things mattered so
much, and not confused, without sinking the storytelling under
slabs of info... Did I not give enough signposts? It's always
difficult with real, but small places. "We lay at Northampton on
our way home to Grafton" doesn't orient everyone (Specially not me.
Being a diplo-brat, my English geography was non-existent until I
was in my twenties, so I'm bad at knowing what readers will and
won't know.)
The thing with kingship at that date is that it's personal: who the
king is and how he behaves really makes a difference, and to that
extent he can do what he likes. And if he chooses to go off without
telling anyone and get married, there's nothing anyone can do to
stop him. He was only 21, after all...
The Stephen Fairhurst reference was mostly just fun for readers of
TMOL, but sort-of a point as well, that all those people have
descendants now, and names and genes go on. Though Fairhurst isn't
a terribly Yorkshire surname, so I imagined his mother having
fallen for a yeoman soldier from Suffolk, who came north to Sheriff
Hutton with Richard of Warwick, say, years ago. The novel I'm about
to start is placed in Suffolk, between the two times of TMOL.
Haven't yet decided if there'll be any Fairhursts in that, but it's
possible.
|
|