| Tue, Dec 29 2009 05:13pm GMT 1 |

Debi
724 Posts
|
Useful online guide to most of the literary competitions you've
ever heard of - and quite a few you won't have.
http://www.writingcalendar.com/index.htm
|
|
| Tue, Dec 29 2009 05:20pm GMT 2 |

Beetle
1 Posts
|
Thanks for putting this up.
|
|
| Tue, Dec 29 2009 10:41pm GMT 3 |

Tony
2107 Posts
|
Yeah, thanks Debbi; good site.
|
|
| Fri, Jan 1 2010 11:58pm GMT 4 |

Caducean Whisks
1226 Posts
|
Fandabbydoobilous, Debster, what excuses can be dreamt up now, for
not entering? One can see one will have to try extra hard. x
|
|
| Sat, Jan 2 2010 12:09am GMT 5 |

Weens
998 Posts
|
Fab, I've been looking for something like this. Mucho thanxo.
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 03:27pm GMT 6 |

Bren
405 Posts
|
Now at least I know there will be some stiff competition out there
if you are all entering. :) You fab lot.......x
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 03:41pm GMT 7 |

EmmaD
1983 Posts
|
Bren, thanks for resurrecting this thread - I knew there was a
place I wanted to post a very interesting blog post about entering
competitions, with comments by the likes of Tania Hershmann who
edits The Short Review, and was Highly Commmended in the Orange for
her first collection
http://sarah-crawl-space.blogspot.com/2010/02/whats-your-strategy.html
Emma
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 04:09pm GMT 8 |

Caducean Whisks
1226 Posts
|
Thanks - thought provoking.
I'd still like to know the credentials of the sifters, though - can
anyone apply to be a sifter? Do they ask the Security Guard's Nan
because she's handy and willing to make up the numbers? Fair
enough, if the Nan is Doris Lessing, but how random is it? If they
need, say, twenty sifters, do they amble down the job centre and if
they can read, they've got the job? Could I be a sifter?
|
|
| Tue, Feb 9 2010 11:08am GMT 9 |

Caducean Whisks
1226 Posts
|
It was a serious question - could I be a sifter?
For the larger comps like Bridport, it makes the judge irrelevant
for all but the final placings, if they never get to see more than
50 of the thousands entered, so all those winning strategies go out
of the window. A 1 in 50 chance is quite good, and I'd be happy
enough to be on the short-list - there's kudos there already, for
the purposes of the CV. Yet to get on that short-list, you have to
impress hordes of invisible people before you're up before the
beak.
I understand that if a single person had to read everything, the
comp could only be run every 10 years, and if you please two
sifters plus the judge, then that's good. But it does mean that the
real hurdle is to get the approval of the sifters, not the
judge, as the odds are 1 in thousands at that stage. This is why
I'd like an idea of who they are and how they themselves are
selected.
Anyone know?
|
|
| Tue, Feb 9 2010 11:52am GMT 10 |

EmmaD
1983 Posts
|
There's nothing to stop you asking - tho' Bridport needs you to be
local, from the sheer business of carting the stuff around. The
main criterion, I should imagine, would be that you're a keen and
knowledgeable reader of the kind of think they're looking for.
Although BritWriters, I know, recruited chiefly among published
writers. A friend of mine - an actress, at that time - started as a
sifter because a friend of hers recruited her, read 700 stories (do
you really want to read 700 stories, 99% of them dire?) realised
she did know good from bad as a reader and also began to think 'I
can do better than most of those,' and is now doing very well
indeed, both writing and teaching writing. I've got money on her
getting either her novel or her collection published in the next
couple of years.
Emma
|
|
| Tue, Feb 9 2010 12:41pm GMT 11 |

Caducean Whisks
1226 Posts
|
Thank you Emma, that's very reassuring - and rather interesting,
too. Hmmm.
|
|