| Mon, Mar 16 2009 08:37pm GMT 1 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
Story telling
Story writing
Memoir
History
Science
Leg-pulling
Lying
We all have ways to structure experience.
Does anyone have ideas around the nature of narrative?
|
|
| Mon, Mar 16 2009 09:50pm GMT 2 |

EmmaD
1983 Posts
|
Okay, this may be a conversation stopper, because you've caught me
in the middle of my PhD thesis, but how about Kearney, who as well
as being a philosopher, is also a novelist, talking about the
narrative act:
"In each case there is a tale, a
teller, something told about and a recipient of the tale...
narrative is a quintessentially communicative
act.…
A tale was spun from bits and pieces of experience, linking past
happenings with present ones and casting both into a dream of
possibilities. "
and then he goes back to Aristotle:
"Mimesis is
‘invention’ in the original sense of that term: invenire means both to
discover and to
create, that is, to disclose what is already there in the light
of what is not yet (but is potentially). It is the power, in
short, to re-create actual worlds as possible
worlds...
mimesis involves both a
free-play of fiction and a responsibility to real
life...
this brings me, ultimately, to what
Ricoeur calls the circle of triple mimesis: (1) the prefiguring of our life-world
[the bits and pieces of experience] as it seeks to be told; (2)
the configuring of
the text in the act of telling; (3) the refiguring of our existence
as we return from narrative text to action."
But my favourite take on fiction is by a critic and novelist
called Maria Margaronis: "Fiction is the memories we don't
have".
|
|
| Tue, Mar 17 2009 04:20pm GMT 3 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
To discover and to create. That is how the act of telling
feels to me.
With a storytelling group, I arrive with a series of stories I
might tell. We talk, and I find the mood of the group. I try a
story, usually a short one, and find out very quickly from the
listeners' eyes if the story connects.
If I get it right, the next step is to draw listeners into the
creative process and make up a story together, perhaps with a
'magic' box or scarf. The listeners are then drawing on their own
experience and fantasy. My role is to shape the story and hold the
boundaries. Between us, we create something entirely new. Could it
be a shared set of memories we each have in part?
This process works with both children and adults (once they've lost
their inhibitions). When I'm writing, I think that process of
dialogue still goes on, but this time, it is a dialogue with my
cast of imaginary characters. Maybe writing is akin to
schizophrenia.
|
|
| Sun, Mar 22 2009 02:03pm GMT 4 |

Harry
315 Posts
|
Do I have ideas on it? Do I hell! I was commissioned by
HarperCollins to write a book on the human storytelling instinct,
but the commission was aborted 1/3 of the way through. (They forgot
to pay me for that third though, for some reason. Or even
apologise. Most unlike a publisher.)
One of the Big Ideas in that book was this. There's loads of
evidence that fiction & make-believe is how we learn to model
and internalise the existence of other minds - and since our
ability to build very sophisticated models of other people's
intentionality is almost the most uniquely human thing about us,
then it's not a wild exaggeration to say that the fiction-instinct
lies at the heart of what it is to be human.
|
|
| Sun, Mar 22 2009 02:14pm GMT 5 |

EmmaD
1983 Posts
|
Harry, when I write my book on storytelling in fiction, may I come
to you for advice? Then there'll be two seminal but
unpublishedbooks about storytelling.
|
|
| Sun, Mar 22 2009 06:02pm GMT 6 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
Likewise, Harry AND Emma (this could start a chain reaction)
When I write a book based on storytelling experiences with people
with learning disabilities, can I come to you both for ideas?
The book (first projected in 2003, before I had written a word of a
novel) would look at the way people interact with stories and
develop their sense of self, and hence their ability to make valid
choices.
No one would read it, and so it would just be a glorious exercise
in self-justification: I like telling stories! A third unpublished
book on storytelling.
However, it is based on a small amount of hard evidence, from
storytelling with the young woman who first inspired the character
in my novel. After four month's storytelling, this adult
was surprising her mother by speaking in longer sentences. It
wasn't about building her vocabulary, although I do think there was
an element of giving her language skills a good stretch. The main
benefit was that the storytelling experience made it feel
worthwhile for her to try and communicate.
She could empathise with the stories (they were and are usually
about her, sometimes in scary situations) and she received positive
encouragement every time she tried to join in or solve a problem.
('Wouldn't do that – you're silly, John!') She found that she had
something to say. And sure enough, when she left the group, her
language skill went down. Since then, it has gone up and down
several times, but we haven't quite matched the original peak.
Maybe it was sheer excitement when she discovered that she could
participate in stories.
|
|
| Tue, Mar 24 2009 09:10am GMT 7 |

Phil
64 Posts
|
Emma's quotation from kearney reminded me of a piece of advice in a
book on narrative I read which was when writing in third person
POV, ask yourself 'who is telling this story and to whom are they
telling it?'
|
|
| Tue, Mar 24 2009 11:30am GMT 8 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
Yes. Sometimes I catch myself telling stories to myself. No one
else would be interested!
|
|
| Tue, Mar 24 2009 06:56pm GMT 9 |

Phil
64 Posts
|
Although if you have a good enough time talking to yourself, others
will want to get in on the act!
|
|
| Wed, Mar 25 2009 10:51pm GMT 10 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
You could have something there, Phil. As a verbal storyteller, I
communicate much better when I'm in a good mood. I lose myself in
the story, and the energy transmits. On a bad day, I'm a mere
narrator.
Writing is a much more deliberate and distanced act. So, who
writes best in what mood?
|
|
| Sat, Mar 28 2009 01:48pm GMT 11 |

Harry
315 Posts
|
I do need to be in a reasonably good head space to write. I
certainly can't write anything useful at all if I'm tired or
hungover or stressed.
Then again, since I like writing more than most things, the act of
writing itself tends to improve my mood. I can quite often spend
three hours at the keyboard and, on the face of it, accomplish
nothing, then get a huge amount of productivity from my final 2-3
hours working.
I'm writing non-fiction at the moment, which is much easier - but
even there, I need to find an upbeat, jokey, energetic tone and
can't do that if I'm not feeling up for it.
|
|
| Sat, Mar 28 2009 03:57pm GMT 12 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
I sense undertones of Tony Hancock in there, Harry. The jokey,
energetic tone and the hangover. But having met you, maybe not...
|
|