| Tue, Mar 17 2009 03:12pm GMT 1 |

Calandra
22 Posts
|
I've written a chic-lit novel aimed at a slightly different
category than your typical Shopaholic/Bridget Jones. It's quite
dark humour: the lead character is a late 30's slightly jaded,
slightly overweight professional woman with a few secrets in her
past. I like to refer to it as 'hen lit' - i.e. for the Shopaholic
fan who is now 10 years older and wonders why Prince Charming is
down at the pub with his mates and she's still cleaning the house
for free. The lead character is also (1) an American in London and
(2) a bit brassy (swears a fair bit, etc.). She has foresaken the
things she feels a woman 'should' want (babies, husband, etc.) for
her career. Throughout the 'journey' she gradually changes as she
is confronted with a lot of hard lessons, etc. I'm not describing
this very well, unfortunately. But overall she's a bit of a Woody
Allen type heroine rather than a warm & fuzzy Shopaholic type
character.
I really feel there should be a market for his in the genre, but
I'm struggling to make the reader 'warm' to her in the opening
chapters. I had one agent say that it was a problem that she was
American rather than British; and another (not agent, but a
published author) say that she was too prickly and swore too much.
In contrast, amateurs in my writing group (mostly men) who have
been with her since the beginning, like the fact that she is balsy
and different than the average Cinderella chic-lit character.
So I'm not quite sure what to do. I've sent this to about 8 agents
in the UK. Seven rejections and one who wanted to read the whole
thing (but never got back to me after 5 months).
I guess options include: (1) 'soften' her at the risk of turning
her into plain vanilla; (2) try some agents in the American market
where I think the humour might fit better; (3) keep her 'as is' and
try to get this published as a second novel rather than the first
(I've got another chic-lit book I'm nearly done with that has a
'warm & fuzzy' main character); (4) try some more agents in the
UK market and try to find a 'fit'.
Anyway, any thoughts would be appreciated.
|
|
| Wed, Mar 18 2009 08:28am GMT 2 |

Spangles
749 Posts
|
Hi Calandra
Your anti-heroine sounds exactly like a friend of mine!
If you were in court with some of those agents you could argue
that there is a precedent for ballsy, prickly American
anti-heroines. In Rivals
(which sold in trillions and is apparently one of Ian Rankin's
favourite books — and mine, too, actually), Jilly Cooper created
a very difficult lead character called Cameron Cook whom very few
of the characters liked. Cameron was impossible at times, having
major tantrums and being hideously rude to people, but she was
redeemed because we saw how vulnerable she was underneath all
that. And she had changed by the end of the book, although she
could still be tricky.
So when you say that one option is to soften your character
without making her completely sappy, could you put in a few
vulnerabilities (if you haven't done so already)?
|
|
| Wed, Mar 18 2009 04:33pm GMT 3 |

Calandra
22 Posts
|
She is definitely vulnerable and cynical about things like her
weight, etc. (sometimes she might moan too much and is definitely a
bit neurotic - I'm still trying to strike a balance).
Maybe I somehow need to make it clear in the covering letter to
agents that this is not traditional chic-lit, but something else???
Dark humour or something. I'm just unsure of a direct comparison in
the genre - she's sort of a female Holden Caufield in Catcher in
the Rye (that was the original inspiration). I'm sure there are a
lot of similar characters, but I haven't read enough 'chic-lit' to
be able to draw the kind of comparison to 'the works of X' that
might be helpful. My worry is that agents would begin reading
thinking it is one thing (or trying to fit it nicely into a
specific box), when it is really another.
|
|
| Wed, Mar 18 2009 04:44pm GMT 4 |

Spangles
749 Posts
|
In that case then, yes, maybe you should explain your character and
the genre you're writing for in the covering letter.
I also haven't read enough chick lit yet to be able to draw many
comparisons between the different writers. It seems to be an
ever-expanding genre — and will, of course, become even bigger
(and richer for it) when our novels are published!
|
|
| Wed, Mar 18 2009 05:03pm GMT 5 |

Calandra
22 Posts
|
I'll drink to that.
|
|
| Tue, Nov 10 2009 12:02pm GMT 6 |

mimi
4 Posts
|
Another thought on this message, even though I am terribly late to
join this topic! I really loved the outline of your character, she
sounds really funny and quite realistic. I think the problem with
chick lit is that the market or readers want someone who is the
best version of themselves or a bit of escapism. When I wrote the
opening chapters of my novel and sent them to my friend she told me
that my character sounded bitter and that I needed to make the
reader like her. So I totally redrafted and now have a different
character altogether, which, for the moment, I am happy with.
I was thinking about your situation and thinking that maybe the
best friend or secondary character to the heroine could be the soft
and fuzzy one, that reflects all the qualities she lacks but then
at times they reach common ground to illustrate that your heroine
can be soft too. Just a thought...
|
|