| Mon, Mar 8 2010 11:57pm GMT 1 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
x
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 03:51am GMT 2 |

Steve
705 Posts
|
Yep - I want more, not bored and I'd think about stealing it.
John is enough of an idiot to be interesting - not in a 'I hope the
hero achieves great things' way, but in a 'what stupid thing will
he do next' way.
This is not a book that publishers will be interested in. This is a
book that publishers will start a six-figure bidding-war over. If
there is a story to tell, or a significant scandal, the Brit press
will be all over it and it will sell itself. International appeal
(certainly Europe and the US), and about the best hook for best
seller sales I've seen in a while.
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 10:56am GMT 3 |

Nashelle
765 Posts
|
This is very readable. Is the main character a yob? Why is he
smashing bottles? Is the first paragraph the best way to
introduce him. If so it could be made more imediate and active.
When you said it was about Google I had imagined it would read
like a text book. Fortunately it doesn't.
I pelt [why pelt? Hurl, perhaps] an empty
Jagermeister miniature bottle
of across the
dancefloor and. It shatters high
against the wall opposite, raining shards of glass on the drunken
scrum below. A friend, standing in the far
corner of the bar, responds by smashing another bottle into the
wall above me. Nobody pays the exchange much
attention, nobody
cares. the dancefloor resembles a mosh-pit and as the crushed mass of
bodies surge in one direction then another, people begin to
panic, slip and fall.
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 11:20am GMT 4 |

Em
349 Posts
|
I think this reads really well, T.W. Wow, what an amazing story
this guy must have to tell, and how exciting that you are able to
tell it. There was just one part that sounded odd, and it was
minor,
'
I may well have been in trouble if she’d have escalated a
complaint but the email, the call, the tap on the shoulder never
came. This will blow over too I told myself.'
Escalated a complaint? not sure about it.
The rest is very readable, and I'm sure Steve is right that
publishers would find it interesting. Good luck with the rest.
BTW, have you changed all names? I assume you are not using real
identities here?
Em
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 11:44am GMT 5 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Thanks all.
Nashelle, thanks a lot for the 'stood/standing' correction - a
classic example of the writer being blind to a glaring error.
The main character is perhaps a little bit of a yob but the scene
is more to show how out of control the party is.
TWD
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 11:46am GMT 6 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Also, Em - 'escalated' is classic big corporation
business-speak.
TWD
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 12:47pm GMT 7 |

Em
349 Posts
|
That's great, TWD. I'm probably the least qualified person to
criticise, but am enjoying finding out what happens behind the
scenes at Google. Its another world!
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 01:35pm GMT 8 |

EmmaD
1801 Posts
|
Apologies for not having time to look properly, but the comments
alerted me to a particular bête-noir of mine, which is a bête noir
of many editors too, which is 'may' used when it should be
'might'...
FWIW, I unpicked it a while back on the Cloud:
http://www.thewordcloud.org/forum/topic/1111
Emma
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 01:45pm GMT 9 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Cool - thanks EmmaD. Yes, I added that bit quite late into this and
you're spot on (Unfortuantely I'm sloppy and need to check,
re-check, check again and edit, re-edit and edit and edit again -
anyway changed! (I haven't changed it in the dialogue though - do
you think I should?)
TWD
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 02:30pm GMT 10 |

EmmaD
1801 Posts
|
You're welcome. I'd be inclined to change it in dialogue unless the
characterisation - of someone ignorant in a modern way of proper
grammar - is an important part of the point, and it's one among
lots of other such errors.
Emma
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 02:41pm GMT 11 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Sure, understood, thanks - it's used in the context of someone
adressing several others and saying:
'As you may or may not know...'
You've thrown me EmmaD! Do you think this is okay or not? It sounds
right to me but you're comments have made me unsure of myself
(you're going to create a madman out of me!).
TWD
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 02:57pm GMT 12 |

EmmaD
1801 Posts
|
Sorry, I didn't look at the original quote (I'm not really here,
you see, I'm marking assignments for another organisation
entirely!)
'May' is entirely correct in that case, because the question of
whether 'you' know or not is still open an unresolved (see the post
I linked to for a proper explanation). 'Might' would be correct
too, mind you, expressing a greater degree of unlikelihood that
they do know.
Emma
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 03:22pm GMT 13 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Makes perfect sense - now back to your marking please.
TWD
|
|
| Tue, Mar 9 2010 05:25pm GMT 14 |

Wrathnar the Unreasonable
426 Posts
|
Great stuff, I was hooked, even tho it's like signals from an alien
planet to me. I thought I knew what 'vertical' meant . . .
|
|
| Wed, Mar 10 2010 04:19pm GMT 15 |

AlanP
299 Posts
|
I think the challenge you face here is bridging the gap between
the reality of what goes on at these company jolly's (do I mean
jollies?), which can every bit as wild as you have described (if
not more so) and making it acceptable to an audience that would
think that such behaviour has come down from Mars. Tricky. So you
could pepper it with computer speak or management speak
buzzwords, but that would probably make it hard work for the
majority but at the same time you have to create that
atmosphere.
Just one thing, in the general scene, rather than the structure.
I worked in this business for years (not Google, but IT) and I
can confirm that people like your subject and his mates are real,
generally they are account managers. But they are also arrogant
and totally devoid of imagination about the real world. Your chap
is worrying about consequences. From his performance and demeanor
I should have thought he would think that really he was a BSD and
would get another job with more money in no time and to hell with
Google. Their loss not his.
Just some thoughts, take or leave as usual.
|
|
| Wed, Mar 10 2010 05:24pm GMT 16 |

maryluv
206 Posts
|
It's interesting stuff, but at the moment I don't really care if
he's sacked. He's hassled women, throws beer bottles around crowded
dance floors and thinks he's an ace pole dancer. Even his
girl-friend is off the peg. Where are his redeeming features - the
things that make me want to emotionally invest in him and therefore
read on?
Google hasn't been done yet, but the yuppy/yobby banker stories the
media are reporting are similar to this and I'm not that keen on
them, either. 'Married, single, other' , currently airing on Monday
evenings has a corporate yuppy as one of the main protagonists.
He's made more sympathetic by his interactions with his mates and
by the fact that he's met his love match. This guy needs humanising
, but that's just my take on it.
|
|
| Wed, Mar 10 2010 05:29pm GMT 17 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Hi Alan,
Thanks for this, some good points raised.
The whole hook is supposed to be Google (an inside view) but then
the whole book's narrative is powered by the story of the lead
character, a village idiot, who tricks his way into the company
only to find himself surrounded by Oxbridge grads and incredible
wealth. So it's a story of how he copes (or doesn't cope) after
entering this secret World. He joins the company in 2005 and is
there for the 4 years of steepest growth of any company in the
history of the planet. It's his story but it's also the story of
Google. The next chapter will go back to his time in a grim
Polytechnic and follow him as he undertakes various menial jobs
until he tricks his way into Google (who he doesn't even really
know about). The book then builds back up towards the
ski-trip.
What do you think? A good story?
What does BSD mean?
TWD
|
|
| Wed, Mar 10 2010 11:37pm GMT 18 |

Tony
1984 Posts
|
Well TWD, I usually make it a rule not to read such long postings;
just haven't the time. But the 'Google' title intrigued me and I
had a look and had no trouble continuing to the end. You grabbed
me. The writing flows and the content makes you want to hear more.
There was hardly anything to fault that I noticed, except "worse
come to worse". The original phrase was "if the worst comes to the
worst" which is still used, but the more logical, "if worse comes
to worst" is more commonly used nowadays. Your version is
used occasionally but seldom in print.
I like the idea of the flashback which eventually takes us up to
the ski party again. Presumably, therefore, you won't let us know
whether he gets fired or not at the end of chapter one!
I enjoyed this. I hope you have a good libel lawer ;-). Write on
TWD.
|
|
| Thu, Mar 11 2010 12:17am GMT 19 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Thanks Tony - correct about the cliffhanger part.
I'll change the part you mention, yes, sloppy on my part - really,
really useful to have such detailed analysis.
TWD
|
|
| Thu, Mar 11 2010 10:27am GMT 20 |

AlanP
299 Posts
|
I see. So he is trying to fit in with a crowd he doesn't really
belong with, thinks he is probably out of his depth and probably
is. Fair enough. Yes I think that it can be a good story although
it's going to be a challenge to convey the change in his
circumstances. I suspect that his personal story will be
significantly more compelling than the Google story, except in one
major point. They both appear to have lucked out for a while.
I see that he isn't going to think himself a BSD, which is city
speak and stands for Big Swinging Dick, ie more important than the
company, a mover and shaker.
Have you read Liars Poker? There's another book I can't remember
the title of, something like, "then they took it all away". Both
evoke the unreal world of smoke and mirrors business (finance and
advertising). Yours is more personal I think.
|
|
| Thu, Mar 11 2010 10:39am GMT 21 |

AlanP
299 Posts
|
"Then we came to the end" by Joshua Ferris. I just used Google to
find that. That's the advertising book I mentioned. Now I must do
some real work.
|
|
| Fri, Mar 12 2010 12:32am GMT 22 |

T.W Duke
125 Posts
|
Thanks Wrath and Maryluv - apologies, I missed your commennt
earlier.
Yea Maryluv, I agree - that's something I'm going to try and do (or
maybe I'll just make him a repulsive carcrash type
character).
Also, thanks for your comments Tony - v. helpful, just like all the
others.
|
|