| Tue, Feb 8 2011 07:34pm GMT 1 |

Cath
8 Posts
|
Any idea on how one regsiters an interest to particpate in
Authonomy Live? I've looked on the site for info and emailed the
Festival, but no luck so far
|
|
| Tue, Feb 8 2011 08:09pm GMT 2 |

Captain Morgan
148 Posts
|
If it’s the same as last year, you – and everyone else who's
booked – will be emailed a comprehensive festival programme
before March, with details on how to apply: the organisers then
select various pieces. Best of luck :)
|
|
| Wed, Feb 9 2011 01:04pm GMT 3 |

Cath
8 Posts
|
Thanks for the info, it's very much appreciated!
|
|
| Tue, Feb 22 2011 09:51pm GMT 4 |

Flickimp
119 Posts
|
Hi
Can anyone
please clarify...
the 300-500
word chunk that must be added?
Is that just a
random chunk from anywhere in your manuscript?
|
|
| Tue, Feb 22 2011 09:57pm GMT 5 |

Autumn
207 Posts
|
That's the way I read it...
And you are allowed a sentence or two to give the context.
Are you going to have a go??
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 10:24am GMT 6 |

Captain Morgan
148 Posts
|
Here’s how it rolled last year:
The selected authors hit the stage in turn, pitched a brief intro
& read their extract on a mic. The judges, who each had
copies of the pieces, gave feedback: authors had a chance to
respond. At the end, the judges chose their favourites & it
went to an audience vote: the author who got the most raised
hands triumphed.
And the extract can be from anywhere in the book :)
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 07:06pm GMT 7 |

Flickimp
119 Posts
|
I am tempted.... wouldn't mind getting up there and giving it a
good go.
But... I must meditate on this.
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 07:12pm GMT 8 |

Flickimp
119 Posts
|
Still... got till March 18th to decide.
Hands up, all those that are eyeing their MS looking for that
scrumptious page of wow
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 07:53pm GMT 9 |

Ro
54 Posts
|
The idea is absolutely terrifying, but I'm considering it. My hand
is rising tentatively...
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 08:31pm GMT 10 |

Flickimp
119 Posts
|
We'll all sign up...
First person will go up... and they will be terrifyingly
brilliant
And we'll just sit there... thinking.... why did I agree to
this...
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 08:40pm GMT 11 |

Autumn
207 Posts
|
LOL! Or we'll prepare like MAD, s*** ourselves til the day, and
then find out we weren't picked to do it!!!
m'wa ha ha harrrr
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 08:56pm GMT 12 |

Mighty Jock
136 Posts
|
I'm gonna have a go! what's the worst that can happen??? ;-)
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 09:29pm GMT 13 |

Captain Morgan
148 Posts
|
Have a shot – such a supportive atmosphere last year: obviously, no
one’s heckled, booed, or the target of launched ice cubes/lime
wedges/cutlery/stilettos. At worst, you’ll either stumble on your
way to the stage or, if you’re profoundly soused, get onstage and
realize you are in fact holding the festival programme instead of
your extract. If this happens, at least you'll have a map of York
in your hand and will therefore know how to escape the city as fast
as possible...
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 09:32pm GMT 14 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
I had fun in the Literary Death Match last year (less serious than
Authonomy) and so I'm going to relax and listen this year. I don't
know if it still applies, but last year, the nervous of heart were
given the option of a pro reader. (I can't remember if anyone took
it up.) If anyone wants a bit of coaching prior to the event, I'm a
storyteller, and may be persuaded to offer advice on reading aloud,
especially when at the bar with drink in hand.
|
|
| Wed, Feb 23 2011 09:33pm GMT 15 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
...and I agree with Captain Morgan!
|
|
| Thu, Feb 24 2011 01:16pm GMT 16 |

Stephy
179 Posts
|
I think i'll probably throw my hat (nervously) into the ring on
this, although not sure which 300-500 words to pick!
Any tips on how you decided on yours last year John?
|
|
| Thu, Feb 24 2011 01:59pm GMT 17 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
Yes, Stephy. I read several passages out loud.
Some lovely passages just don't work in front of a big audience,
and there's also the matter of whether your voice suits the
content (imagine Judi Dench reading the football results). Find
something that's really good, gives a complete picture, doesn't
need much explaining, and suits your voice, and you've got a
winner. That test cut out most of my book!
In the end, because the death match wasn't a serious contest, I
chose a passage I could ham up and mess around with. Anyone who
remembers Harry's performance may realise that I wasn't the
only one who took that route.
|
|
| Thu, Feb 24 2011 05:07pm GMT 18 |

Flickimp
119 Posts
|
Well said John Onceupon and Captain Morgan
Maybe I could read out the Epilogue.... give the whole plot/twist
away...
|
|
| Thu, Feb 24 2011 07:56pm GMT 19 |

Stephy
179 Posts
|
Thanks John, very helpful advice. I've got a few singled out, so
i'll try reading them out loud this weekend and see if any of them
work.
I do remember your (and Harry's) performances from the Death
Match - very engaging and very entertaining :-) It's a shame
you're not going to go up for it again.
|
|
| Fri, Feb 25 2011 07:05pm GMT 20 |

Natalie James (Tors)
253 Posts
|
That's my problem to JohnO, something that doesn't need much
explaining...it's a touch tricky with my piece.
I am scowering my piece to find a suitible admission.
|
|
| Fri, Feb 25 2011 08:05pm GMT 21 |

Debi
727 Posts
|
I was one of the Literary Death Match judges last year. Nerve
wracking to try to think of witty responses to such a diverse range
of readings/performances, though no doubt not as hard as it was for
the person being 'judged'.
Good luck to all of you. Be assured all contributors will be
applauded for their creativity and courage.
|
|
| Fri, Feb 25 2011 08:07pm GMT 22 |

John Taylor
916 Posts
|
Tors, you don't need to explain too much: just enough so that the
audience can get a handle on your words. I wrote about four
sentences of explanation for mine last year, but got it down to
this: 'A girl with a learning disability goes to a fairground with
an elderly biker.' I could have said more, and I could have said
that it was a turning point in the book (which it is, because it's
the day when she really begins to believe in herself) but I think
it's best to let your words do the work.
|
|
| Fri, Feb 25 2011 08:52pm GMT 23 |

MarkR
141 Posts
|
Such wisdom by all in this thread.
It's great to put your hat into the ring - frightening but
broadening because there's that chance you'll get picked so you see
your own work through different eyes. I'd recommend it even if,
like me last year, you don't make the few that read on the night -
I still learned a lot and enjoyed all the readings. Autumn's got it
right.
It was a very supportive atmosphere last year and I'm sure it will
be just the same in March. JohnO and Harry and other were great in
the deathmatch.
I do think it was tough for the judges too but, if I remember
rightly, liquid refreshment helped maintain their enthusiasm ;-)
|
|
| Fri, Feb 25 2011 08:55pm GMT 24 |

EmmaD
1991 Posts
|
Don't worry about too much explaining - one sentence is
always enough! You're not trying to explain the story,
only to set up the situation that you're about to read: "Jane has
appeared on her ex-boyfriend's doorstep, determined to get back the
record collection that they shared." Honestly, that's all you
need...
It's worth practising it a few times, to get it tight and make sure
you don't ramble, and then writing it in along the top of your
script. That's what I do for readings... And consider cutting out
the one line by a character who isn't mentioned in the whole of the
rest of the extract.
Emma
|
|
| Fri, Feb 25 2011 09:04pm GMT 25 |

Debi
727 Posts
|
And when you practice, make sure you are reading slow enough. If
you are, it will almost definitely seem TOO slow.
And *ahem* Mark's right about the ... er ... liquid refreshment.
And there we were thinking people wouldn't notice ...
|
|