
EmmaD
1997 Posts
|
It depends whether Jackie is our pair-of-eyes for the novel, and we
experience it all through her (him?) or whether you're working with
a wider perspective and an omniscient narrator. If the latter then,
yes, in principle there's no reason why we can't know more than a
particular character does, but if the reader already knows what
Marty thinks, then there's less narrative tension built into the
lead-up to the showdown with Jackie. We're not trying to work out
Marty, only wanting to know what Jackie will do when Jackie finds
out about Marty's thinking. And again - where's the tension in an
encouter with a murder suspect if we, the readers, already know he
isn't? We will be wondering a bit what Jackie will do when he/she
discovers, and mildly whether it'll change things now Winterbottom
knows that he's not suspected by Jackie. But in a plot-driven novel
that's unlikely to be enough.
Fundamentally, I guess, the problem is that in both these scenes
there isn't enough at stake: for Jackie there may be, but not for
us: we know the outcome can't be all that dramatic.
You may not need to re-write the whole novel - but you may. It
sounds as if you do need to set to and map out what Jackie knows,
what the reader knows, what any other VP character knows, in each
chapter, and make sure that it all works.
|
|

stephenterry
1882 Posts
|
I was afraid you were going to say that...
The story is told through several POV characters, mainly JACKIE,
but also Marty and the (now) unnamed killer. So I can clarify the
Winterbotham scenario to make him a suspect.
With Marty V Jackie it's different. He doesn't know Jackie is on to
him. But I'll take your advice and map it out.
thanks Emma, you've helped a lot.
|
|