Matters of Life and Death

Published by: Gerry on 10th May 2012 | View all blogs by Gerry

Last year (2011) we took a trip to America for the first time, hiring a Ford Mustang and driving through California, Arizona and Nevada. It was glorious discovering new places, new environments, new ways of doing things, but we didn’t leave all the discovery till we arrived. We brought a couple of guidebooks beforehand, googled a few places on the Net, pored over some maps and studied details in the brochure.

All this is quite natural.

How about the Bigger Trip at the end of earthly life? Where are the guidebooks? Which web pages should I google? Where are the maps and tourist brochures? Once again it is natural to want some information. Where should I try?

From time to time I hope to post articles on 'Matters of Life and Death', and shall be evaluating various sources of information:

·       Science: how much, if anything, can it tell us about non-material reality?
·       Religion: how much can the familiar Christian variety tell us?
·       Poetry and music: can these reveal any ‘Truths of the Imagination’ for us?
·       Inner Resonance: how much weight can I place on something that ‘rings true’?

And there is one more source I shall consult, Spiritualism. For a writer, it is a brilliant resource. Spiritualism had a considerable vogue before and after the First World War, but nowadays it is deeply unfashionable. As a result, there is a cornucopia of wonderful but neglected materials for me to plunder

At my bedside I have volumes with such evocative titles as Life Beyond the Veil, Gone West and The Living Dead Man. They all date from the time around the First World War and have a sense of the drama and intensity involved in the time. But wait a moment, you might say, aren’t they too spooky for the bedside? Not at all. They make splendid bedtime reading, often cheering, frequently astonishing, always fascinating. I have dog-eared many a must-revisit page, made vertical lines in the margins of read-again extracts, and added double – or even treble – lines for especially mind-boggling material.

But how much can I trust such things, I hear you ask. Well, there are basically four answers to this:

·       Firstly, I can check the materials for consistency. How do they match up against each other – and also against more recent material coming from Near Death Experiences and Hypnotic Regression? Do they support or contradict each other?
·       Secondly, I can ask how far the stories match up with common sense. That is, do the humans behave as humans (albeit in different circumstances)?
·       Thirdly, I can employ the Inner Resonance guide (as mentioned above) – do the stories and descriptions ring true?
·       Fourthly, as a novelist I can ask whether they would make darn good tales.

That last one is a good criterion for me. I am engaged on writing an updatedDivine Comedy trilogy in which the scope and vision of Dante are compounded with the buddy-style interplay of, say, Butch and Sundance. A mismatched pair of cousins are sent to quarrel their way through Earth, Hell and even Heaven (which is not where you’d expect to see a lot of quarrelling, but they’ll find a way).

Recently I have been busy with Book Two, A Short, Selective Journey Through Hell, and have happily drawn on Life Beyond the Veil, Gone Westand The Living Dead Man, as well as plenty of other resources.


Well yes, you might say. Rattling good tale, you might say. But is it all true? Do you really believe all that stuff?


Well, my friends, believe is a funny word. It implies loyalty to one set of propositions and not to another. This can be very limiting, and, if you are a scientist, it can be disastrous. There you go building your career on – what? – certainties about dinosaur bones, about continental drift or perhaps even the speed of light, and then along comes evidence to prove your whole life is one big mistake.


No, belief is a very limiting word. Let’s go with something rather more open. It has been suggested that science fiction writers do a lot better in the Next World than saintly believers, and this seems credible to me because science fiction writers are in the business of imagining the unimaginable. They’re not held down by the diving boots of belief.


So let’s say I value Life Beyond the Veil, Gone West, The Living Dead Man and suchlike for their Wow factor. They may or may not hold vast amounts of truth, but I can try to check them for consistency, common sense and resonance. And, having done so, I’m inclined to say yup, they make the better story.

*****

(This post has been simultaneously published on my blog  http://dimensionsbeyond.typepad.com/ 
complete with a lovely pic of Death Valley - seen from 'Dante's View' - which I would have included here, only I couldn't get the picture uploader to cooperate, alas. Do feel free to call in on said blog and sample the numerous delights therein...)

Comments

11 Comments

  • Aonghus Fallon
    by Aonghus Fallon 1 year ago
    Hell always seems to hold a special fascination for writers. The last riff I remember on Dante's Divine Comedy was by Larry Niven - a Sci-Fi author. The central character's companion was Mussolini, if I remember correctly. My key reservation about doing so is that be acknowledging the existence of Hell, you must also acknowledge a devil, and by extension, God - and God seems to be an entity that most fiction writers are deeply uncomfortable about - myself included!
  • Gerry
    by Gerry 1 year ago
    Hi Aonghus - shall check Larry Niven - thanks for the info. God (or people's view of God) does tend to leap in as soon as we step outside the mundane, which doesn't strike me as overwhelmingly necessary. Hell, for instance, can be a state of mind we can experience here and now - so, if our minds survive death (which some would dispute of course) then it seems reasonable to assume we can continue such experiences.

    That would, of course, change the meaning of Hell from the standard theological never-get-out location - but changing the meaning strikes me as a pretty good idea. I've always been suspicious of eternal damnation - it strikes me as a power tool used by emperors and amenable priests to keep the population obedient. (Reincarnation, for instance, would immediately obliterate it - so reincarnation had to be outlawed - back in 553 AD if I remember rightly, Council of Constantinople.)

    As for God and fiction, I can think of one quasi instance - the Force be with you. What is this Force? (It strikes me as having some similarities to the Holy Spirit, but I dare say some people would object to this idea.)
  • Weens
    by Weens 1 year ago
    You could take Judasim into account too. It's one of the oldest religions in the world. It's surprising how many people believe in God but not the devil, Heaven but not hell. How can you have one without the other, good without bad. There has to be two sides to the coin.
  • Gerry
    by Gerry 1 year ago
    True Weens, I could consult various other religions - and lots of people of my generation have been much influenced by Hindu thought, for instance, as percolated through the pronouncements of various yogis and gurus. I feel safest, though, with the tradition I know best.

    Does Judaism have a lot to say about The Beyond? Angels - such as Gabriel, Raphael, Michael and Uriel - have Jewish names, as I understand it. I notice the 'el' bit at the end of their names, and I think of the 'al' syllable that the Moslems favour, and I suspect there may be a lot in such things, but I hesitate to pronounce on what is somewhat unfamiliar territory.

    And an interesting point about duality - does God imply a devil? Does heaven imply a hell? It's hard to imagine anything that doesn't have its opposite. (Or am I wrong?)
  • Nibs
    by Nibs 1 year ago
    wow.
    What a wonderfully written blog.
    Thanks for sharing your thoughts and ideas etc.

    I for one think this is what makes humans such a fascinating race of beings.

    Such a wide range of opinions in every direction imaginable.
    I never thought about belief being a limiting word but now you've made me think, it actually can be quite limiting can't it.

    Wasn't it A Einstein who said imagination is more important than knowledge. Because to gain knowledge one has to first imagine. (this came to mind when I read your para' on the sci fi folk and their imaginings)

    I wonder sometimes, why do we have religions across the globe? I used to believe they were necessary for early man because early man needed to be led and tought. But now I often feel it is just another method of controlling the masses. (I'm not talking about faith here, just religion).
    Religion is such an evocative subject and people become so passionate about the fact that their belief and religion is the one and only true way. Why should you be right and he be wrong, why should you be wrong and he be right?

    Personally - I don't regard myself as religious, having a faith or a belief system.
    I know there are different energies out there, energies that help us, and energies that hinder us. Hopefully we learn which to trust after we've learned to trust ourselves.

    If I'm asked to put myself in a catagory, then it would have to be Spiritualist SNU (not christian spiritualist). Simply because this way is closest to what I'm about. Closest to what I am as a person and human being.

    Your books and stories sound fascinating.

    regards
    Nibs
  • Weens
    by Weens 1 year ago
    The Jewish religion says that you should go out of this world with what you came in with, ie nothing. That is why Jewish people are buried in simple wooden coffins, no polished oak with velvet linings for us. New borns are given two names, an everyday name and a Jewish name, and the Jewish name is usually named after a relative who has died, the theory being that the person you are named for, will watch out for you throughout the course of your life. That of course implies that there is belief of an afterlife. I'm not religious enough to know more than that. I will say however, that there are a heck of a lot of similarities in some areas between the Islam religion and Judaism
  • Nibs
    by Nibs 1 year ago
    I've never been interested enough in religion to check out what each are about.
    I love what you say about the way of the Jewish, giving a day to day name and a Jewish name - being from a past family member who will look out for you. That sounds lovely.
    In Spiritualism, we get given a name if we want one during a naming ceremony, this name is given by Spirit - To be known by in the realms of Spirit. Which I think is also quite lovely.
    I've not had a naming ceremony, but I've often been told by mediums that Spirit see me as a little Daisy. Because when trodden on by passes by, I bounce straight back up and hold my head high. :o)
  • Tony
    by Tony 1 year ago
    I was trying to remember the name of a bloke who spoke at our church some years ago and have just come across it. Ian McCormack was declared clinically dead after being stung by a box jellyfish. He was dead for about 15 minutes. You can see his amazing story here:

    http://www.aglimpseofeternity.org/ians-testimony/ians-testimony.php

    Scroll just over halfway down to get to the printed 'Shorter English Version'. His experience should certainly add to your research, Gerry.
  • Bren
    by Bren 1 year ago
    Great blog Gerry. Interesting. The ou are doing a course on religion adn philosophical discussion at the moment. I was looking at it to try and laern how to express my beliefs more clearly.
    Spiritualism is not as popular as in Victorian times but it is far from dead - no pun intended. :) Judging by all the money being made by spiritualists. And have you looked at the book list under that genre. Masses of info.
    Good way of gathering material - by the time you have finished it will make a brilliant book..
  • Gerry
    by Gerry 1 year ago
    Why thank you, Nibs - what a lovely response. This is one of the great things about the Word Cloud - you can try out any sort of idea, trivial or profound, and get responses that set you thinking. Perhaps I was a bit simplistic about belief. Sports people, for instance, think it is indispensable - yu gotta believe yer gonna win, that sort of thing - and in other ways, more spiritual, it probably can move moderately sized mountains. Fascinated to hear you associate yourself with the SNU. Are you a member? (Love the daisy metaphor, by the way.)

    Weens - a couple of gems there. Firstly, the simple coffins - very evocative thought. And secondly, of course, the names. People in the Christian and post-Christian traditions don't pay nearly as much attention to ancestors as people in other traditions - and I think we miss out as a result.

    Tony - fascinating link. Fits in well with other testimonies - of the Life After Life variety - but with some interesting emphases - his certainty about who he met being the main one.

    Thanks all - great stuff!
  • Gerry
    by Gerry 1 year ago
    Bren - crossed with you. Nope it ain't dead, but it does seem to have run out of oomph, at least so far as general public consciousness is concerned. I think a key moment came in 1939 when the Archbishops of Canterbury and York decided to sit on a report that was favourable to Spiritualism. Had they been more adventurous, things could have been very different. I shall be blogging on that in the near future.
Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up now.

Subscribe

Getting Published


Twitter

Visitor counter



Literature


 

Blog Roll Centre

Books

Blog Hints

Blog Directory