Mr Nice

Published by: Harry on 21st Oct 2010 | View all blogs by Harry
This piece in the G-G-G-Guardian harps on about a pet peeve of mine: the ridiculous notion that characters have to be likeable in order for a writer to write a compelling novel.

The notion has two sources, I reckon. The first is book group chatter. People feel they don't like a book, can't quite locate the source of that feeling, so blame the characters as not being nice enough to share a dinner with.

The second is agents. They have a habit of saying things like: "Thanks for sending me your MS. I admired your writing, but I just didn't love the book - I felt I couldn't quite empathise with your protagonist."

In both cases, I think it's nonsense. It's easy to think of amazing fiction with orrible protagonists.
  • Othello - bad guy, nice wife.
  • Macbeth - bad guy, nasty wife.
  • Hamlet - bad guy, bad mum.
  • Lear - bad, mad guy.
  • And in today's era the same thing: American Psycho, for example. ('Sorry, Mr Ellis, but I felt your portrayal of a typical Wall Street banker wasn't quite empathetic enough. Was it really necessary to have him saw up women with a chainsaw? Mightn't it be better to have him show an interest in home baking and charity work?')
All this is nonsense. Only one thing matters and that's the creation of an amazingly compelling story. A dash of nastiness somewhere in the story (either the hero or villain) is pretty much essential, as it happens. In 99% of cases when agents blame an insufficiently empathetic character, there's actually a solvable editorial deficiency in the writing, which the editor hasn't correctly identified. (Cos they're not a writer, and in most but not all cases, not a natural editor either).

Anyway. Rant over. Your turn. Rant away. Rant against my rant, or in favour. But toot your horn and have a say.

Comments

56 Comments

  • CJ
    by CJ 1 year ago
    I totally agree with you, Harry - some of the greatest characters out there are bastards. One of them is a guy called Jarlaxle, created by a fantasy author called RA Salvatore. It is no coincidence that most of Salvatore's characters are archetypal heroes (and many people therefore find them boring), but Jarlaxle is a flamboyant, intelligent, manipulative criminal... who is almost universally loved, despite doing despicable things. I've even had experience of it myself - in one of my hobby projects, one of my main characters is sleazy, manipulative and selfish... and yet he is the one character people say they love. Whether that's because they pick up on how much I enjoy writing bastards, I don't know... XD
  • Bren
    by Bren 1 year ago
    My main character is not very likeable - Jarrold said he found it hard to like him, but, but - women love a bastard. Women always want to rescue them. Isn't that what the agony pages are all about. Look at Wuthering Heights. Glorious, evil hero.
    I am on your side Harry.
  • Bren
    by Bren 1 year ago
    oops did I relly use a 'word' not like me. :)
  • Bren
    by Bren 1 year ago
    really - I can smell the potatoes burning - it happens a lot since I discovered Cloud!
  • Khaloth
    by Khaloth 1 year ago
    I don't care if the character is likeable, so long as he is interesting and beliveable.
  • Lilith
    by Lilith 1 year ago
    read Creed by James Herbert - awesome protagonist. not sappy and typical "i will defeat thee!" etc etc, instead he's a bit of a bastard, well, more than a bit.

    protagonists who aren't all giving charity workers who desire nothing but to foster the good hearts of the world, the ones with a bit of a darkside and temper are always the more interesting, plus they add realism and more dimension to the character - no one is entirely good or nice all the time.
  • karen
    by karen 1 year ago
    No-one wants a do gooding, to good to be true, soppy protagonist, that's just dull. Even the good guys need a dark side!
  • Sue
    by Sue 1 year ago
    Heathcliff or Mr Rochester? Give me the former every time... Well, perhaps sometimes...
  • John Taylor
    by John Taylor 1 year ago
    'Nice' characters are useful for finding out about the author. Everyone's idea of a sympathetic character is bound to be different, and to differ with the author's personality. Self-indulgent authors and authors in denial are the easiest to spot!
  • John Taylor
    by John Taylor 1 year ago
    Following from Sue's post, I've just had a look at the programme page for next year's York festival. All I can say about your idea of a 'typical local' from Wuthering Heights country, Harry is, 'Ee bah gum lad, you have imagination.'
  • Skylark
    by Skylark 1 year ago
    Nice characters have their place but even nice characters need flaws otherwise they are just not believable (and that is, I believe, Harry, one of the first lessons I learned from your first crit of my novel!) As for bad characters, two examples spring to mind. First, Iris Murdoch's the Black Prince. The protagonist, Bradley Pearson, left a sour taste in my mouth. I really didn't like him one little bit but his story was compelling and I couldn't put it down. Considering that I read it about 10 years ago, it has stayed with me too. Second, Patricia Highsmith's Tom Ripley. You can't get much more evil than that (or perhaps just amoral....a discussion for another day...) but not only was I compelled to keep reading, I even found myself on edge every time he was almost caught hoping that he would get away. Not sure what that says about me but I put it down to very clever writing rather than any twisted sense of morality on my side! PH made a hero out of someone who is quite definitely not a hero and you end up feeling quite uncomfortable with yourself anytime you end up rooting for her hero. And finally, just to echo something Ely said at the beginning, I love writing bad characters as they much more interesting and it can be really cathartic to explore the darker side of your imagination. Being a "good" person, writing is the only time that I ever go near it, if that makes sense.
  • Kim
    by Kim 1 year ago
    Many of my preferred TV and film characters are like the best chocolate brownies - dark yet squidgy, wickedly naughty and impossible to resist. For example:

    1. Judge and jury, serial-killer Dexter (Whoever thought that it would be possible to empathise with a mass-murderer?)
    2. Narcissistic, arrogant House
    3. Any one of the professional assassins from brilliant In Bruges, especially Harry
    4. Disturbed, intriguing, philandering attorney Alan Shore from Boston Legal
    5. Devilishly tempting Darryl Van Horne from the Witches of Eastwick

    Who wants Barbie’s Ken? Surely ‘nice characters’ are as insipid as their title suggests.

    I agree, make 'em at least a tad iniquitous.
  • Babblefish
    by Babblefish 1 year ago
    I have to agree- "Nice" characters usually come across as pathetic. HOWEVER (an now I'm arguing almost just for the sake of it), I have only one protagonist that I would follow to the ends of the earth (Miya). She isn't 'nice' as such, but she is fundamentally good (A fact that eventually gets her killed :-( ). I wonder if that could be applied to several of the examples sighted earlier (for instance House may be a jackass, but I also believe that he is a good man. From what I've seen of Dexter the same logic would apply).

    I dunno, I'm just interested. In the real world I see people all too often being "nice" rather than "good", and I wonder if that is reflected in the protagonists people like to read about (they like to read about people who have more backbone than them, even if this sometimes leads to jackarsery)
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Absolutely Harry, i'm with you! Was Hannibal Lector nice?? Crazy!
    My own YA Fantasy bad guy, is really bad, slightly concerning that I may be asked to tone him down, but surely that would ruin the "good Versus evil" bit. Even my main good guy is selfish!! Everyone loves a baddie!
  • norman normington
    by norman normington 1 year ago
    Well after seeing all the female contributors seemingly declare they like bad guys, I would like to add how bad I am, no real bad that's me. i'm the baddest of the bad. Yesterday I parked in a spot at work someone else always uses and then I stayed 5 minutes later than I should have during my tea break...how is that for bad?
  • Lilith
    by Lilith 1 year ago
    that's.... awful, how horrendous of you :P
  • Barb
    by Barb 1 year ago
    Sorry Norman: "You're semi-evil. You're quasi-evil. You're the margarine of evil. You're the Diet Coke of evil. Just one calorie, not evil enough. "

    In relation to bad guys - Wesley does become seriously more attractive when he also takes on the role of the dread pirate Roberts.
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 1 year ago
    Skylark mentioned Ripley, who is of course a classic anti hero. I have a large book of Patricia Highsmith short stories that I am dipping in and out of. I think that a lot of her protagonists of either sex are dislikeable. It's a feature of her writing and she seems to have been quite successful. Of course she wrote in a different era and that is the key to this, for me.
  • Barb
    by Barb 1 year ago
    Edward from Twilight, or Spike from Buffy. No contest.
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 1 year ago
    Just to lob a sweet little prawn into this shark-infested broth, I'd like to stick up for Mr Nice. Nice guys often appear in fiction as wet, 2D, boring, beta males - mere foils for their raping, pillaging and plundering alpha brothers. Yet in real life, genuinely nice men are *not* wet, 2D, boring, (to me at least) - they're a breath of fresh air, people to trust, they keep their word, they act honourably - and that is more of an aphrodisiac to me than a cave man without two brain cells to rub together. The key is "genuinely". Methinks "nice" gets confused with "unassertive" and they're not the same thing at all. Unassertiveness may (but doesn't always) mask seething resentment, nurtured grievances, even seriously dangerous people who lash out unpredictably and in an uncontrolled manner. They scare me. I don't want to read about these extremes any more than I want them in my house.
    So why are "nice" guys so under-represented in books? I wonder if it's because they're quite hard to write? Difficult to make them interesting? Even though they may be interesting in real life? Is it too hard to give them a credible conflict in literature? Is that a good enough reason to avoid trying? In the same way that it's quite hard to write a really feel-good happy story, but we all remember them when we've read them, eh? I'm thinking "The Darling Buds of May" - who's the baddie there? Even the tax inspector ends up as the son-in-law. Or "The Good Companions" by JB Priestley. Plenty of conflict but a compelling cast of *really nice* people who are kind to each other. And "Hard Facts" & "These Lovers Fled Away" by Howard Spring.
    I wish there were more really nice guys in books.
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 1 year ago
    And Emma's Stephen Fairhurst from TMOL. He's another good un.
  • John Taylor
    by John Taylor 1 year ago
    Yep, definitely Stephen P, not to mention that wet-shirted bloke Andrew Jane Austen-Davies wrote who didn't know he was a good guy...
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Norman - funny!
    Whisks - I do love a good, good guy too, and they never seem to really win do they?? But bad guys are fun to write, and even more fun to read when they are written right. Of course, in the real world; nice dudes are better.
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    Not all bad guy heroes are fun- I hated Heathcliffe in wuthering heights. I like the broooding types. The ones you think are bad but just have 'issues' My Darcy in Pride and Prejudice. I so love him, and Saywer in Lost. They are essentially good just not 'nice.' So basically, characters with hidden depths- not pushovers and not meanies. The reason why I love Edward in Twilight is that he's not mean but any second he could lose control and eat ya- kinda sexy!
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 1 year ago
    Tell me then, ladies. Where does Sydney Carton come in this assessment.
  • karen
    by karen 1 year ago
    With all this talk about all the bad guys - what about the bad gals? Where do they feature and do we like em bad or are they just ladies with 'issues'! Off the cuff, I'm struggling to think of any..............except for Cruella de Ville in 101 Dalmations!
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 1 year ago
    *Whisks notes a hole in her literary repertoire and scuttles off to read "Tale of Two Cities" so she can answer the question* - is that the right book for the dude?
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 1 year ago
    @karen: Lady Macbeth? Medea? Sharon Stone in "Basic Instinct"? Good point.
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    I'm ashamed to admit that I've never read a 'Tale of Two Cities' either. I think the men are the best to answer the bad gal question... *looks about*
  • karen
    by karen 1 year ago
    Of course Whisks, how could I forget Lady Macbeth!
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Gerilyn - I mean fun to read as we love to hate them, not fun as in "they are lots of fun". I agree, Heathcliffe was awful!
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    I love Edward, but for me he's a bit of a wuss, give me Damien from Vampire Diaries anyday lol
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 1 year ago
    Those of you off to read up on their Dickens - see you on Tuesday.
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 1 year ago
    As to bad girls. I think the male perspective may be slightly different. Bad girls are good :-)

    I think that the requisite character is evil. This is a movie example (or two) rather than books, but there's:

    Barbara Stanwyck's character in Double Indemnity
    Kathleen Turner's character in Body Heat.

    Oooh. I have to stop there. Just, well, aah, um. I'll be back.
  • Debi
    by Debi 1 year ago
    I think there's a need for a definition here and it revolves around that bland word 'nice'. The point is, we don't necessarily need to like a main character but I'd contend that we do need to care about what happens to them.

    Some of those powerful examples are characters who are deeply damaged and their actions and attitudes (which we might deplore) are a direct result of this damage ie we might hate the actions but we understand where they come from. We believe in them. We recognise that under the same circumstances perhaps we would end up the same. That's where the empathy can come in so that we care what happens to the person even while despising what they have become.
  • Mythwriter
    by Mythwriter 1 year ago
    To take from a movie, I keep hearing Jack Sparrow pop into my head in all of this. Call me a pirates of the carribean fan, but still, I make my point, lol. There are simply evil, neutral, and good characters that are well made and can end up thrilling the reader in some way, whether it be their attitude (Jack Sparrow), or their absolute genius (A character I wish to make in my story, but she turned out a little different... more of a psyco 'balance-driven' killer, but eh, what can you do). It all depends on how the character is made
  • Ron Blanco
    by Ron Blanco 1 year ago
    In real life, nice people are also regarded as boring. I've heard women say: "I dumped him because he was too nice." What sort of crazy logic is this?

    But a likeable character is not necessarily nice. If a story doesn't contain any likeable characters then it will end up being a depressing experience.
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    Keeks- I didn't even like reading Wuthering heigts- I didn't like any of the characters. I see what you mean about Edward Cullen quite a few of my freinds think he is a wimp too. Now Jack Sparrow is good example- he is delicious!- but he's not a bad boy either is he? Ron- my fave 'nice boy' is Mark darcy in Bridget Jone's diary! And yep likeable character don't have to be nice. In fact 'Nice' is a terrible word isn't it? I'd hate to be described as 'nice.'
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Bizarre...I was thinking Mark Darcy!!!! Great minds again! lol
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    The last line in the film when she says 'Nice boys don't kiss like that!' and he says 'Yes they ******* do.' love it- Have just edited the earlier comment as I am such a bad typist everything I write is full of typos :D
  • Ron Blanco
    by Ron Blanco 1 year ago
    Mark Darcy seemed nice but miserable. Why did you like him?
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    Hmmm I could go on about hidden depths being a 'deep' character, but he wasn't miserable was he? He just kinda disapproved of Bridget. But there's something sexy about guys who appear pretty straight laced and then reveal themselves to not be. It must be like the male equivalent of liking sexy secretaries? Girls in glasses who then let their hair down... I dunno- I just like Colin Firth ;D
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Aah, he was't miserable, a little bit poker-up-the-arseish, but not miserable. I agree with Geri, it's just Colin Firth and there is something about a man in a suit!
  • Ron Blanco
    by Ron Blanco 1 year ago
    Dry, then? But I didn't find him likeable.

    I'm a Cameron Diaz fan myself... always a very likeable personality.
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    Yes he's dry- and a bloke doesn't have to be 'likeable' to another bloke to still be a good guy. I think though that if the character had been played by a different actor he would not have been so sexy. So you're a Careon Diaz fan... hmmmm.
  • norman normington
    by norman normington 1 year ago
    Hey Kiki is there something about a bloke in gungy old tracky bottoms a dirty old hoodie all covered in cement and plaster, his hands cut to ribbons and covered in calluses...No! Damn...
  • norman normington
    by norman normington 1 year ago
    Cameron Diaz...no Caroline Lucas maybe...mmmmmm....Green party leader....
  • Ron Blanco
    by Ron Blanco 1 year ago
    Going back to Harry's blog. If a character is likeable then we want them to come through their scrapes unharmed. Whereas if a character is dislikeable we hope they will get their comeuppance. It can't be healthy to endure a whole novel hoping that everyone dies, so a good story must have some likeable characters, surely?
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Ron - defo! You need both, but what I think Harry was saying was that they need to be realistic even if they are fantasy.
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    That's why I didn't like Wuthering Heights. I couldn't care a less whether Heathcliffe died in the end- I wanted them all to die. But saying that, one of my favourite books is The Shining and in the end you're not rooting for the main character at all are you? But he is charasmatic despite being an axe weilding loon.

    and Norm, there is something to be said about men who are good with their hands- even if they are calloused.
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Wuthering Heights was just bloody annoying! Now, The Shining, that's a different story - I love Stephen King! He always kills his darlings! Look at The Green Mile, killed another darling!
    Norm - You make me larf!
  • Ron Blanco
    by Ron Blanco 1 year ago
    Wuthering Heights was great up to half way, and Heathcliffe was a great character. It made me laugh when Gordon Brown compared himself to Heathcliffe - certainly he was a lying, cheating tosspot, but I don't think he shared the same charisma. Now there's another attribute that draws us towards characters both in books and real life, charisma.
  • Kate Allan
    by Kate Allan 1 year ago
    I think its more complex than whether a character is nice or nasty, it's whether the reader can empathise with them. So while there is nothing redeeming about Othello, Heathcliffe etc we can still FEEL for them. My golden rule is that characters have to evoke emotions in the reader. THEN you have a "successful" character.
  • Gerilyn
    by Gerilyn 1 year ago
    So all we have to do is make our characters charismatic. There, we've nailed it. Don't you find that in a lot of story's the villain tends to be more charismatic? Like the Joker in Batman and Lex Luthor in Superman- ok maybe that just applies to comic books. But definately charisma wins over nice- which is probably why girls dump 'nice boys'. It's not because they're nice, it's because they are boring.
  • Kiki
    by Kiki 1 year ago
    Kate - That sounds like a good golden rule, do you have to test this theory out on others before you know if a character is successfull? The reason I ask this is because all of my characters evoke emotions in me but i'm not sure if others would feel the same
  • JtF
    by JtF 1 year ago
    **Author's voice alert **
    The last line in the film when she says 'Nice boys don't kiss like that!' and he says 'Yes they ******* do.'
    Curtis must have thought that really funny at the time - not in my household where that word caused great embarrassment to the assembled multi age familial group in attendence. My close encounter with such a "Bill Grundy" moment (boot thru the screen) was exactly because this was out of character with everything seen before. That one word (and usually effing is just poor writing) was a betrayal - and for those who saw "The General's daughter" on TV (the book's even better) betrayal is the one thing worse than rape!
    Nice doesn't mean neutered; unassertive; devoid of passion or deathly hallows dull as dishwater boring.
Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up now.

Subscribe

Getting Published


Twitter

Visitor counter



Literature


 

Blog Roll Centre

Books

Blog Hints

Blog Directory