Pistols in the misty dawn

Published by: AlanP on 29th Apr 2010 | View all blogs by AlanP
Once more I see sensibilities offended, hackles raised and insults flying. Being busy I was late to the party but I see that there are wounds and casualties once again. I almost wrote this, or something like it, on a previous occassion. This time as the miseries of my latest client diminish, I have time and I will, even if I may be a little late for the main event (story of my life).

Two hundred years ago and more when one was offended by another person’s opinions, words, actions etc it was necessary to send a friend to call on the other party and agree swords or pistols. Personally I am pleased that we seem to have progressed to the stage where the lead that flies, flies across cyberspace and the steel that would otherwise pierce vital organs has no greater effect than ramming a few keys into the keyboard, and perhaps out the other side.

In the interest of sanity and decorum some sense of proportion needs to take hold, I think. The internet, role playing games, chat boards and the multitudinous social networking sites are an opportunity for individuals to masquerade as someone else. And what’s wrong with that if it’s not intended to harm someone, be unpleasant or commit a crime? In my real life I am a properly boring engineer and I spend my days with properly boring lawyers making the money that my family rely on for food, clothes warmth etc. But I have a dream, one many of us have I suspect. I want to be a writer. On here I can be. Is it a masquerade? Perhaps it is. The person I am here is a writer and it’s not really me; is it! It’s what I want to be.

So, I don’t care if Wrathnar the Unreasonable is real, or for that matter if the Tony he fessed up to was real (although clearly not). Because they aren’t real. Wrathnar is a person with a real name who evidently drives buses, plays guitar and has had a colourful earlier life. Or is he? Is he really someone dead boring, like me, who has this alter ego who is in this case vastly more entertaining. The fact is I don’t care. I like him, real or otherwise. I also like Indiana Jones and he was certainly made up.

Writers write and they make stuff up. So what.

Comments

14 Comments

  • EzBloke
    by EzBloke 2 years ago
    I missed all the kerfuffle and am sadly at a loss to add anything sensible to this so I'll just point out that I am not in real life called EzBloke and am a vicar by trade... I'm a fully paid up member of writerholics anonymous and will be until someone teaches me to write proper... Sooooo, who got kicked off the cloud then, and what exactly did they do?
  • Ancient Woodland
    by Ancient Woodland 2 years ago
    Alright Wrathnar, fess up - you're really AlanP too, aintcha?

    Seriously, I'm a red delicious with some wicked dentistry. Any idea how difficult it is to type with your tongue? *Licks his eyebrows*

    Good grief, I'm losing it. Is it Friday yet?

    Edit - Ez - someone called Lin insisted verbosely that it was perfectly acceptable to be a complete Nob and the cloud (and many others) disagreed. The cloud won, it was no contest really.
  • maryluv
    by maryluv 2 years ago
    I did note that it was the male clouders who contributed to the kerfuffle. Us females just sat back, tutted and ate malteasers.
  • Tony
    by Tony 2 years ago
    I agree with Alan that people can pretend to be whoever or whatever they like in cyberspace and that's OK as long as they behave reasonably, civilly and inoffensively. Heated debate is fine; verbal abuse and bullying is not.

    However, having said that, my own defininite preference is interacting with the people who present as they really are (or at least appear to - I suppose we can never be certain, but it's usually possible to spot, or at least suspect, those who are not what they seem.) As Alan points out, of course, people's online personas can be just a likable - perhaps more so, who knows? - when they are made up, as when they are genuine.

    But one thing I DO NOT like is when an established member rejoins as some other alter-ego to cause mischief and mahem. It's not at all funny, except for them - and I can understand how it must be very ammusing for the perpetrator, fooling all their erstwhile friends and indulging themselves by perhaps holding a debate between their two presences. Great fun. But not for anyone else.

    There is absolutely no keudos in achieving the deception. As there is no way of detecting it at first, there is no skill involved by the perpetrator; any fool could do it. All it does (at best) is waste others' time in welcoming non-existent new members and ultimately make them feel foolish that they didn't realise it was a hoax. Not a practice I would recommend for anyone who wants to be taken seriously on here as a writer. So let's wipe the slate clean for any past offenders and carry on in our newly enlightened environment - helping, encouraging and building each other up, as the site was originally established to do. Write on, everyone.
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 2 years ago
    Indeed not AW. I dream of being WTU. In reality I am much less. Shedding my alter ego I confess that I am 27 years old, athletic in the way that women find irresistable with the kind of ruggedly handsome features that women also find irresistable. I have several PhDs and have studied the decline in the rain forest, which happens to make me irresistable to women. I recently received thanks from Paul McCartney for allowing him to use one of my tracks on a charity album. I don't mention this often as it causes women to admire me want to be my dear and close friend. I give freely of my time to many good causes, making me irresitable to women and of course I have published several books under another name. This last (as observed by Sean Connery in a movie I otherwise forget) is guaranteed to make you irresistable to women.
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 2 years ago
    Ez, I have never been a vicar. Does it have any discernable effect on one's attractiveness to women?
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 2 years ago
    Tony, of course. Nothing wrong with a bit of fun but not if it becomes cruel. And for the avoidance of doubt I made up most of the last two posts, as I am wont to do.
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 2 years ago
    Maryluv, Indeed, but think of your teeth.
  • SecretSpi
    by SecretSpi 2 years ago
    I have a confession. i'm not really a spy. Well, not on Thursdays.
  • maryluv
    by maryluv 2 years ago
    S'ok, Alan. I took them out.
  • Tony
    by Tony 2 years ago
    Where did you take them, maryluv? Anywhere nice? (The Chomps Elise in Paris, perhaps.)
  • Wrathnar the Unreasonable
    Tooth a park? Or an avdenture playground?
  • Weens
    by Weens 2 years ago
    Alan, you've completely ruined the mental picture I had of you.
  • mike
    by mike 2 years ago
    There is a play I recall 'Pretending to Be Me? The play is an interpretation of Philip Larkin' life. Did Philip Larkin invent himself? Is Philip Larkin an invention of Tom Courteney who played the part? I enjoyed the play and liked Tom Courteney whereas I might not have liked Philip Larkin- had I met him. What about Grahame Greene? I saw a film in which he was impersonated by Michael Caine. Are all writers pseudonymous?
Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up now.

Subscribe

Getting Published


Twitter

Visitor counter



Literature


 

Blog Roll Centre

Books

Blog Hints

Blog Directory