Scholarly or Popular?

Published by: Boria on 28th Jul 2009 | View all blogs by Boria
Should I call it "scholarly" or "popular"? That is a question that I encounter in searching for a publisher for my book City of Ravens: How ravens came to the Tower of London, why they stayed, and what they tell us about nature and humankind. Academic presses have sometimes told me that I should look for a trade publisher, while the trade publishers tell me it is "too academic." Now, what I would like to reply is, "It has the extensive documentation and careful argument that is expected of a scholarly book, but it is written in the accessible style of a popular one." That is what I think, but I am not sure that either the academic or the popular ones will be satisfied. Publishers so often seem to want us to slot our books into neat divisions, and something in me resists that sort of categorization.

How can we clarify the difference between scholarly and trade publications? And which, if either, way would be best to present the book? For whomever may be interested, I have put the proposal on my web site at:

http://www.boriasax.com/City%20of%20Ravens/BookProposal.dwt
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Boria

Comments

3 Comments

  • Aonghus Fallon
    by Aonghus Fallon 2 years ago
    I'm Irish and there's an apocryphal story that the Ravens in the Tower of London started to die out during the war and Irish ravens (from Westmeath, no less) were introduced to ensure their survival. Is this true? Sorry I can't help re scholarly vs. popular.
  • Harry
    by Harry 2 years ago
    Publishers need to sell books. Academic publishers have one kind of business model (high priced books, limited distribution). Trade publishers have another (lower prices, higher sales).

    You need to make sure that your book satisfies the needs of at least one publisher. That also means understanding bookshops. Where will your book be shelved? I'd guess history would be the most natural choice, but yours is a very specialist subject and you need to make sure that a Waterstones for example would feel confident of being able to sell your work. Avoiding these issues is intellectually / artistically liberating ... but also not the best way to get into print!

    Again, because we haven't read the MS, it's hard for us to advise in much more detail. But best of luck

    H
  • Boria
    by Boria 2 years ago
    Thanks, Harry for your comment. On the proposal, I write,

    "This book will appeal to the following audiences, in order of probable commercial importance:
    1) The millions of tourists who visit the ravens at the Tower of London every year and would like to know more about them.
    2) Scholars of folklore and human-animal relations, fields where the author has already published extensively and is well known.
    3) Readers who are interested in the development of myth, whether on a scholarly or popular (i.e., New Age) level."

    I also say that the book could be shelved under folklore, history, and animals. Since about the Tower Ravens are one of the most popular tourist attractions in Britain, and there is no previous book on them, this is something that should have wide appeal. The book is "specialist" only in the sense that it incorporates a lot of research, but it is not written for a narrow audience.

    Again, for anyone who wants to have a look, I have placed the proposal on the web at
    http://www.boriasax.com/City%20of%20Ravens/BookProposal.dwt.
    B
Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up now.

Subscribe

Getting Published


Twitter

Visitor counter



Literature


 

Blog Roll Centre

Books

Blog Hints

Blog Directory