Scientific Research published on St Valentine's day
I grow weary of 'Scientific Research' that sets out to
prove the bleeding obvious. Who pays these
post-graduates to loaf around 'mid dreaming spires wasting their
space and my time? I would like to believe it
ain't me but ... ...
Today I found news of a 'scientific' report in my national daily - admittedly originating in the US but confirmed by UK boffins - informing us that the majority of young men get broody. (Broody?! It's a term coined by breeders to describe hen fowl ready to mate and produce fertile eggs. Can the term be applied to cocks?) Anyway ... most males aged 16 to 24 confessed when asked that they would like to have children of their own. Stop the world and pass the sal volatile! Whoever heard of young men wanting children of their own?
The same research also found that a growing minority of young women are choosing not to have babies. Shock horror! Forgive me but isn't it only in the last 50 years that women have had any choice in the matter?
Is it because of my age and the circles I've moved in that I have known very few men who didn't want and love their children? And a smattering of women who chose not to have them?
Okay, so there are weirdos who live life against the grain but they are not the the norm and scientific research into the blindingly obvious makes me wonder if my Gran might have had a thing or two to teach at PhD level.
Has any scientist ever set out to produce an equation proving the power of love?
Today I found news of a 'scientific' report in my national daily - admittedly originating in the US but confirmed by UK boffins - informing us that the majority of young men get broody. (Broody?! It's a term coined by breeders to describe hen fowl ready to mate and produce fertile eggs. Can the term be applied to cocks?) Anyway ... most males aged 16 to 24 confessed when asked that they would like to have children of their own. Stop the world and pass the sal volatile! Whoever heard of young men wanting children of their own?
The same research also found that a growing minority of young women are choosing not to have babies. Shock horror! Forgive me but isn't it only in the last 50 years that women have had any choice in the matter?
Is it because of my age and the circles I've moved in that I have known very few men who didn't want and love their children? And a smattering of women who chose not to have them?
Okay, so there are weirdos who live life against the grain but they are not the the norm and scientific research into the blindingly obvious makes me wonder if my Gran might have had a thing or two to teach at PhD level.
Has any scientist ever set out to produce an equation proving the power of love?


31 Comments
L = Gt^2/s^4
Where G = 6.67 * 10-11 (m³/kg s²) or (N m² / kg²)
Must say I loved this little gem of yours: Broody?! It's a term coined by breeders to describe hen fowl ready to mate and produce fertile eggs. Can the term be applied to cocks?
Okay, so there are weirdos who live life against the grain but they are not the the norm and....
No one is the Norm only Norm is the Norm..
Scientists kill em all
And these campaigns like the ones I used to get at school, something obscene like £3 million spent on leaflets and a key ring that says "dont do drugs". Wow. Thanks alot. Half of my year are either incarcerated or unconcious and where are those key rings now!? I ask you.
Barb, the comment you take issue with is a side-swipe at researchers who love to put us all into neatly labelled boxes. I have no children and when I was obviously of child-bearing age I was constantly attacked for being selfish (always by women who didn't know my circumstances at all). I never rose to the bait.
Normington has it about right. :-D
Makes no sense to me at all - and I do have kids!
Since this has attracted a deal of unforeseen comment and I am not in an argument with anyone about it, I will say that I always felt the women talking that way - mothers all - must have thought my childlessness enviable if to them it proved me selfish. Perhaps it was simply a coincidence that my life-style in those days was a good deal more affluent than their own? I wonder if a childless pauper would get the same amount of stick?
Funnily enough, nobody ever asks a man how he plans to balance fatherhood with a career.
I am fortunate enough to have three daughters and I have been called selfish for choosing to give up work to bring them up, and selfish when I went back to work as they grew up!
Basically - you can't win whatever you do! There is always someone comparing themselves favourably who should be getting on with their own lives. I think it's their way of trying to justify their own choices - but no idea why they feel need to do that. I find it disgusting to comment on someone's childlessness anyway - they might have been trying for years and knowing a couple like that it is heart-breaking.
I don't think a childless pauper would get called selfish - perhaps they would be seen by the 'name-callers' as sensible for not having children they can ill afford?
Both my mother's side and father's side were happy that I'd chosen to further my carreer. My dad's mum is a retired headmistress, she had taken the unusual step of mothering 3 children and holding down a successful carreer in teaching.
When I told my family that I was expecting my first child- at the age of 31- they were again delighted. I think mum was relieved I hadn't done the baby stuff as early as she did because then she'd have been a 36 yr old Gran- eek.
I've never looked at a childless woman and thought she was being selfish.. I may have looked a little envious if that woman happened to be walking past in a pristine expensive looking outfit while I dragged my boys in the other direction wearing chocolate and snot stained clothes. While we were trying for our first child I would look envouisly at the bumps of pregnant woman.
So I find it all a bit sad that other women have encountered these prejudices from a) other woman and b) their families.
Equation for Love
L = Gt^2/s^4
Where G = 6.67 * 10-11 (m³/kg s²) or (N m² / kg²)
I think that must be the Newtonion equation, which worked perfectly well up to about the late 60s/early 70s, but we now obviously need the Einsteinian expansion, which introduces the child factor:
(Cm + Cf)/2 - CF + s²
where Cm and Cf are the numbers of children wanted by the mother and father, respectively; CF is the Career Facter and s is Selfishness.
I am a childless woman so wouldn't like to comment one way nor t'other :-D!
!
Click here to sign up now.