Screenwriter of the Week- Scrooge

Published by: Robin on 24th Dec 2011 | View all blogs by Robin
I didn't plan on leaving it quite this late in the day but here is the second part of my Christmas blog and as I am writing it the film itself is about to start on Channel 5. But don't worry about missing it because it's the colourised version which really does rob it of a lot of its charm. There is considerable argument about which is the best version of the oft-filmed Dickens story 'A Christmas Carol' and based on the response I got last week there is a considerable movement in favour of the Muppet version, but there is far less argument about who is the best Scrooge; it is the part that Alistair Sim was born to play. He was one of our finest comic actors anyway but as Scrooge he simply excelled.
But of course I'm not here to talk about Sim I'm talking about Noel Langley who did this particular screen adaptation, and it would be wrong to ignore the contribution that script makes to the film's success (which goes way beyond Sim's dominating central performance).
I just assumed that the writer of Scrooge would have a raft of Ealing comedies and small British films I had never heard of on his CV, but Langley is actually quite intriguing. He was born in South Africa but worked predominantly in the US, though Scrooge is far from his only UK cedit. His best known credit I was shocked to find is for The Wizard of Oz, a job he won on the basis of his successful children's book the Tale of the Land of Green Ginger. Oz famously went through 3 directors but it was also worked on by 18 writers! Including some I have already blogged about (John Lee Mahin is one of the most surpising names), Langley was one of only 3 to get a credit, ironically since he hated what was done to his script and didn't like the finished film to the extent that he tried to make a sequel using the bits of his original which were cut out.
Adaptation seems to have been a something Langley specialised in; he adapted Dickens again for a largely unregarded version of Pickwick Papers, as well as Tom Browne's Schooldays and Svengali. Swashbucklers seem to have been another interest (and I should make it clear that I'm interpreting from his CV here, I know next to nothing about the man!), he scripted Knights of the Round Table, Prisoner of Zenda (The Stewart Granger version) and, most famously, Ivanhoe.
Though the screenplay work seems to have stopped in the fifties I have to say that my main interest in Langley is his abilty to write in different media. As well as film he was a novellist and playwright, he wrote for both television and radio as well as being a short story writer for various magazines. As a jobbing writer myself who has tried his hand at everything and will happily go where the money is, I identify with this and admire it. A writer isn't a writer unless he writes, doesn't matter what, and Noel Langley was clearly a writer through and through.

Comments

2 Comments

  • MinxieAD
    by MinxieAD 5 months ago
    I wonder what A Christmas Carol would have come out like if Langley hadn't been involved, or if Sim hadn't got the role of Scrooge?

    I watched It's a Wonderful Life in B&W on Thursday and Scrooge in colour. They've done a good job, but it does lose its nostalgia as a film. Part of its charm is the era it captures and even though the world was in colour, it doesn't seem right somehow? Bit like when they made the World at War and changed original footage so it would be in colour? You're not looking at anything real, just a green or red which equals that particular shade of grey.

    In keeping with the sentiment, Merry Christmas Robin, I'm sure ;) Have a good one and I shall look forward to some more interesting reviews in 2012. The only thing I'm looking forward to tomorrow is The Gruffalo's Child.
  • mike
    by mike 5 months ago
    That particular film version of Pickwick Papers is not unregarded. I had a video cassette of this film and watched it many times. I wonder if the Victorian illustrations of Pickwick Papers had been an influence on this film? Modern TV adaptations tend to present realistic interpretations of the characters. Dickens was fond of the theatre and, at that time, performances were extremely OTT.
    From the interpretative point of view, this film might be more accurate than the recent ones.
Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up now.

Subscribe

Getting Published


Twitter

Visitor counter



Literature


 

Blog Roll Centre

Books

Blog Hints

Blog Directory