What is with fake reviews on Amazon?!!

Published by: templar1 on 28th Sep 2011 | View all blogs by templar1

My paperback for my second book, 'Hunt for White Gold', is released tomorrow so being in a good mood I decided to check out reviews on Amazon. Now I don't check reviews normally as no news is good news and I'm one of those who would rather not know. All OK, so I decided (just for wasting time) to check out some reviews for authors I know personally and others as my clicks just kept leading me from one to another.

Now we all know that there are reviews that give glowing Oscar-like speeches about how wonderful the book is and if you're a savvy Amazon cruiser you normally click 'See all my reviews' and notice that the reviewer has only reviewed that book and go, 'Oh, aye. That's funny. You must be related or a friend,' and discount it. But then I started to think a bit deeper about what this means.

First off, I noticed a pattern, (and I'm not just talking about indie authors I'm talking about traditional books as well; from people I know) often following a rave review there would be a comment or low star review about it along the lines of 'I don't know what book you were reading but,' or 'I wrote this review because I bought this book based on the glowing reviews and,' and generally these people are upset and disappointed.

The other pattern was that a lot of these five-star reviews had clearly not read the book. By that I mean that a genuine review seems to talk about the book in specific terms. They mention characters names, talk about certain plots, talk of parts that moved them or what their experience of it was and even point out why some people might not like it in order to strengthen their recommendation and not mislead. This is almost certain true of a bad review (which often follows) where the reader has blown the book apart. But at least they read it!

You can fill in the blanks yourself but they all follow a similar style:

'Couldn't put it down! Blew me away! Fantastic characterisation!(who? Why?) A real page-turner! Sensational plot! (what's it about other than the blurb above? This is usually where they insert a synopsis of the exact blurb) Kept me on the edge of my seat! (about what?) A roller-coaster ride of thrills and tension! (about what?! Tell me!)'

See what I mean? Now the thing that annoys me about this is that this is often driven by the author either directly or indirectly and supposes that your prospective audience is an idiot.

'If you give me a five-star review people will buy it! Then I'll have their money, ha, ha!'

But what you're actually doing is selling a book that sets itself up to be a disappointment. You're trying to snake-oil people into buying your book. And once you've hoodwinked them once why would they buy your second?

The other disturbing trend I noticed was in clicking on the comments. Often people took the time to write things along the lines of 'I have tried to give this book a bad review but it keeps getting removed.' This may be because of two things. The author reports the review as abuse and asks twenty people to do the same so the review gets removed or, surprise, surprise, Amazon are in the business of selling books and will find any excuse to remove it.

The bottom line is I spent a considerable time checking one author's forty-plus five stars reviews only to discover that two-thirds of them were written by people who had only ever reviewed that item and none of whom showed any sign of actually reading the book other than regurgitating (love that word) the hook of the book.

Personally I do check reviews if I'm intrigued by a book that I wouldn't normally buy and I always use the criteria above to see whether I trust that review or not. To me the reprehensible thing is rather than try to build loyalty with readers through your writing or genuine word of mouth you'd rather bamboozle people into buying your book.

There's an old adage about selling cars that highlights this. 'You don't sell a guy one car. You sell him five cars over fifteen years because he trusts you.'

 

 

 

Comments

12 Comments

  • SecretSpi
    by SecretSpi 7 months ago
    I started a thread on this here:
    http://writing-community.writersworkshop.co.uk/forum/topic/5723

    Good luck with your book and I agree - I'd rather have no reviews than all those fake ones. I did rather hope that people had caught on by now and that the days of "I'll buy you a pint if you stick a 5* review on amazon" were over, but it seems not. It does reflect badly on the author.
  • Mythwriter
    by Mythwriter 7 months ago
    Hm... I'm glad I read this for when I do get published. I knew that there was stuff like that, but I didn't realize how much. It's disappointing the lengths people will go to 'butter up' the product to sell it. I will definitely be taking a lot more care in the 'reviews' they decide to put on the book or where it's being sold. It reminds me of commercials in a way, "9 our of 10 doctors agree that -----", yes, but doctors in what? a doctor for surgery talking about toothpaste? I'm just glad I have friends that can give me honest reviews about my book
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 7 months ago
    It's not just Amazon reviews. I find a lot of professional reviews positively misleading. It's as though the reviewer, often an author themselves, is trading backscratches. As with some of the Amazon ones there are standard non specific phrases that give away the fact that the reviewer hasn't read the book, but may have had the synposis.
  • templar1
    by templar1 7 months ago
    Exactly Alan.I know of authors who were former, or are, journalists who garner reviews from their papers but that's how the world works. Note AN Wilson's glorious review for his new Elizabeth book in the Mail. The Economist fiction reviews are sometimes baffling to this end. I would be insulted by the suggestion of 'you do mine and I'll do yours.'
    SecretSpi thanks for the link, I'll have a look.
  • Aonghus Fallon
    by Aonghus Fallon 7 months ago
    I think it's very hard to fake a good review - try giving a friend's work a positive review and you know what? Nine times out of ten, it will end up sounding completely phoney. Furthermore, such reviews often attract negative reviews from readers trying to redress that imbalance. Which is fair enough, in my opinion. And I don't think I've ever bought a book on the basis of an Amazon review.
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 7 months ago
    I view reviews on Amazon with a wary eye as well - but you all seem to be assuming that a glowing review misleads the public. Don't forget the book may actually *be* brilliant.
    Just saying.
  • Barry Walsh
    by Barry Walsh 7 months ago
    Agree Alan, so many back cover reviews are not by literary reviewers but fellow authors. Nice to have but barely credible. LIke Aonghus, I've never bought a book on the strength of an Amazon review; I only notice them when on Amazon having already decided to buy a book, when I doubt that even a bad Amazon review would deter me.
  • Amarantha
    by Amarantha 7 months ago
    I don't take any notice of a reviewer's opinion of a book and certainly wouldn't bother reading reviews on Amazon. Unless it's very badly written it's a matter of readers' taste. If the storyline attracts me sufficiently I buy it. A story may be un-put-downable or prove to be so boring I can't read beyond the first chapter. This applies to favoured and unfamiliar author's alike.
  • Weens
    by Weens 7 months ago
    Well you learn something every day. I do read the reviews when I'm deciding on a book to buy. I shan't bother in future. Thanks for the eye opener.
  • Joanna
    by Joanna 7 months ago
    I always read the reviews on Amazon and often find the bad reviews more enlightening than the good ones - if there's a literary book which has been praised to high heaven in the papers and on some of the blogs and you find that on Amazon there's five or six reviews saying 'This is a load of boring, self obsessed tosh,' I generally find those more accurate on reading said book than the comments along the lines of 'uplifting prose' , 'probably the book of the noughties, sensitive, groundbreaking, sheer genius...'
  • SecretSpi
    by SecretSpi 7 months ago
    Dear Weens - I do hope you won't stop reading the reviews, especially as I'm a Top 1000 reviewer ;-)
    Seriously, I wouldn't want anyone to get the idea that all reviews on amazon are tosh, just to be aware that reams of 5* non-specific but glowing reviews are suspect, especially if they are the only review the reviewer has made.
    My reviewing is mostly self-motivated: I find that it's a help in my writing and it's also great to have a record of everything I've read in the last few years. If my reviews help , interest or entertain others, that's an extra bonus!
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 7 months ago
    It is possible that those who are directly asked to review a book on the existensional tendency of Genghis Khan to defer meditation in favour of direct action would be a self selecting group that might find the subject interesting, nay uplifting, were they visiting professors in historical tyrants and empires built through extreme violence. They would be a self selecting group and the rest of us might find the book less so in all events. These should be easy to spot. On the other hand, taste being so variable I expect to find even books I personally like to have some bad reviews. It's when there is a torrrent of them and they are all good five stars that I begin to wonder.

    Oh, Spi. I have come across one or two of your reviews.
Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up now.

Subscribe

Getting Published


Twitter

Visitor counter



Literature


 

Blog Roll Centre

Books

Blog Hints

Blog Directory