This. Is why
By Guero DavilaThere’s a time when the muse can creep up behind you and whisper sweet somethings in your ear. It can strike anywhere. Like a viper. Like a virus.
It can be ignited by a scent, a sound, a snippet. By a random thought that infected you when you least expected it and yet suddenly you’re in its thrall, its chains wrapped tight, its padlock impenetrable.
And that’s the time when you like it most.
It drags you.
It wrestles you away from the everyday, it strangles your hold on the now, snuffs it out, smothers you, breathes new air into you, replaces your cells with others that vibrate and rattle your bones, it rips at your skin and inserts Machiavellian notions of purposeful prose until you submit to its eager enchantments and forego other pleasures just to sate it.
And that –
Is when you love it.
cold counts
By godessami15The price of vanity and a waste of a perfectly good lie
By AlanPWhat we have here is a slice from my real life. Most of what I do is covered by confidentiality agreements and so I can’t reveal much about it. Some of it is priceless and I wish I could, but I can't. The events I am about to relate are, however, well in the public domain, just not given from my point of view. Until now, that is. I shall provide a link or two at the end for those who may want to read further, if I can follow Steve's recipe.
I was in recent times engaged in a dispute between a computer supplier and a TV broadcaster to provide technical advice to the lawyers, because the broadcaster was suing the supplier for rather a lot of money over the supply of a computer system. They were doing this because the project to design and build the system had gone horribly wrong, as these things do on occasion. However, they were so miffed, along with certain other legal necessities, that they decided they had been lied to about the capability of the computer system supplier to do the job and wanted enough money to run a small country in compensation.
Five years passed and rather than settle, as most such disputes do, it actually went to trial. The key witness, let’s just say an American gentleman in the employ of the supplier, had been the main negotiator at the time they won the contract and we had spent considerable time and effort in checking what he claimed, his spreadsheets, calculations, technical and business assumptions etc etc. Despite a certain propensity to feel somewhat nervous about the chap in general, for example I would not have been very happy were he to propose marriage to my daughter, we felt that what he had to say was true and defensible.
Which made it all the worse when, rather than attempt to destroy his evidence about the matters they had brought the case for the other side chose to discuss his academic qualifications. Don’t get me wrong, they attacked his evidence too, but not to the same spectacular effect. In fact his evidence stood up rather well.
Our man, you see, had but one academic qualification; an MBA from somewhere called the Concordia College in the US Virgin islands and they had a copy of his CV. Under questioning our man described the buildings, the classrooms, the course material and many other details of the course of study he undertook; and much much more. They kept him at it for seven days in all and kept returning to the MBA like a bit of sport every once in a while. He never wavered for a moment. It was a magnificent performance under enormous stress.
The great pity is that there is not a Concordia College in the US Virgin Islands. In fact there is a swamp in the location given. The opposing barrister, a Queen’s Counsel no less and a Spurs supporter to boot (which just adds insult to the injury) had obtained over the internet at a cost of a few hundred dollars an MBA for his dog, the now famously well qualified Lulu. In fact Lulu had achieved better grades than our man. My immediate stance that Lulu is not a proper dog’s name was not considered relevant; not that I voiced it outside the padded room against whose walls we were beating ourselves nightly during this torment
In consequence the judge elected to not believe a word that our man said and as in one or two places he was the only one saying it it rather destroyed our defence as can be seen
here and
hereObviously we did not idle our time away while this was going on, although by law we were not permitted to discuss his evidence with the gent we were shoving fingers in the dyke all over the shop. In the main we spent our time furiously cross checking what other witnesses, not likely to be so exposed, had to say on the serious matters. Unfortunately, there were some bits that only our man knew about. If you have read the links you will know that, for my client, this did not end well.
The issue in the end was vanity I suppose; and arrogance. In his spare time our man was something of a well known international poker player. Working in a company surrounded by first class degrees in computer science, business, etc etc he must have felt he needed some letters after his name. So he bought some and, being a poker player, decided to bluff his hand when the stakes went up. The problem was that the truth could be proved, as it eventually was.
One late and depressing night I proposed that we should find ourselves an expert in alien abduction. We could then present the possibility that our man had been abducted for a year and that his memory of the college was implanted to account for the missing time and to replace the memories of the dreadful experiments to which he had been subjected. My argument was that it was going to be rather hard to disprove, unlike the existence of the Concordia College. My proposal was judged not worthy and it was suggested that I return to my spreadsheets, where I was supposed to be. But I still can’t see what was wrong with it to this day, other than its not being true and our team being somewhat scrupulous about honesty. Waste of a perfectly good lie in my view.Extrovert / Introvert?
By DanI'm in Jerez de la Frontera, in the south of Spain, for a week by myself - just a week - and I'm already lonely. A trip funded by my own self-importance and desire for adventure, I've found that it's been the opposite of everything I imagined. I'm not a loner, just lonely; I'm a thinker, but I really want a break from my own company; and I'm certainly not someone who lives off shunning people.
Some of you will quite rightly point out that I'm 27 and that I should have grown out of trying to be like a character from the movies, like Indiana Jones or Wolverine, but I guess it's been ingrained since my youth. The truth is that I admire them for their ability to be independent, to walk through life with only their thoughts for company.
You see, I'm an extrovert. I love being with people, huge groups of people, for as long as possible. It sounds like attention-seeking, but it's not. Or maybe it is. But somehow, as a human being, I depend on social interaction to sustain me. Without it, I feel like I'm going mad. I'm sat in my hotel room now, writing this blog whilst my extroverted self is frantically trying to pull down the walls inside of me.
So I have my heroes because I want to be able to be independent from people, like they are, but I can't. I want to not have to rely on people, but it's not possible. Without people, I would go crazy.
The irony is that I came here to write a story set in Cadiz and, although the trip has been invaluable for setting and plot, I have had no inspiration for my writing, nor even any desire to write. How shocking. How disappointing. But I have no doubt that, after I've returned home and spent a few nights with good friends, the juices will flow again and I'll want to lock those same friends out and write for a while. Then I'll need to see them again. People give me energy, passion, desire. I want to be self-reliant, but I can't.
Some of you, of course, will think completely contrary to me. You will admire the people who are the centre of everyone's attention, who draw laughter or engage an audience without even trying, while you curse your inability to socialise. You long to be the extrovert, despising the fact that you draw your energy from being alone. You cannot stop yourself being introverted, but you damn well fight it.
Sadly, you are, and always will be, the introvert. And I will be trapped in my own head until I can escape Jerez.
Who needs friends
By LissEver since the start of last year, myself and my friends have been planning a short holiday together.
The idea was, that my one friend Rachael drives three people and my other friend Lucy drives two. It was all set, the hostel was booked, we were happy. I had asked Lucy and Rachael again and again that they were happy and comfortable driving and every time they said yes.
However.
Like all the best laid plans, it went to absolute hell in a handcart. Rachael's car died like two days before we are due to go and Lucy suddenly starts to get annoyed that she's going to have to drive.
& to top it all off, when I go to her "oh it's all gone down the drain." she adds insult to injury, (after just whining at me about driving), by going "alice everyone is trying to do their best, I think you should really be more positive."
What the preverbial heck!?
Not only that, but my stupid sister who has drank all of our coca cola, is insisting that I drank it.
Sometimes I hate people and even a holiday wouldn't make things any better at all. Holiday for one?
Real People in Your Writing
By jazzgirlGossip -Is it Ever a Good Thing?
By jazzgirlThere's another quote which I love too taken from a poster that was up in an office I used to work in. it read:
Small people talk about other people
Average people talk about things
Great people talk about ideas
If that is the case then I am sometimes a great person but I have to admit I do love to talk about people. I mean we all do though don't we? Especially as I am a woman. We love it. Show me a woman who says she doesn't EVER gossip and I will show you a liar!
As a writer I HAVE to be interested in people and what makes them tick and I am sure you will relate to this too. The meaning of the word gossip has changed over the centuries from it's original definition of "kindred relation" to empty talk. Now the Oxford English Dictionary definition of gossip is casual conversation OR unsubstantiated reports about other people. Therefore I would say that the former is human nature-we all talk about other people and the latter is the bad thing. So gossip I think is only a good thing if we're not maligning people or spreading rumours. I've probably just stated the obvious I know but maybe we all need to be reminded from time to time about what is acceptable gossip and what is not.
Some people dream of fame but I'm so glad I am not as I think I would be having nervous breakdowns every day with the amount of gossip you get in today's media.I think that is an utter scandal in itself and people like the paparattzi and gossip columnists should bow their heads in utter shame making a living out of other people's misery. It's worse than it's ever been.
As long as gossip isn't malicious or maligning it can be a good thing surely. For example I really want to have a gossip about one set of neighbours on my Close to another! The reason being that one set of neighbours are being utterly grumpy sods with us these days. They've suddenly gone from being really nice to really grumpy and almost shunning me and my partner. I've tried the proper route by talking to them direct but to no avail. Now if I were to talk to the neighbours on the other side about them I may discover something useful like Bob and Linda are grumpy sods because Bob lost his job or someone in their family died. That way I would understand what is going on and I wouldn't want to gossip about them anymore!!!!
Anyway I guess I'll keep on gossiping (in the "interested in people" sort of way) because if I didn't I don't think I would have much to write about!
"Hell is other people" John Paul Sartre once said and when it comes to malicious gossip they are. But I think just talking about other people generally isn't so "small" after all.
'Til next time,
Jazzgirl
People: Talkative Aren't They:
By Meta Tam When Hi NonYou point any opinion towards Religions pointless tirade of being helpful towards those in need, yet somehow, it is the cause of more wars then I care to consider. Christians "Let us burn those who do not conform to our beliefs"....actually I have the biggest problem with Christians when you consider they're the kind of religion who populised the method of "Destroy those who do not believe" instead of "You believe what you want and we'll leave".
Richad Dawkins is logical and makes sense when he blasts anything outside the realm of science (good for him), nice to consider he's married to the woman who Romona 2 in Doctor Who.
George Carlin knew what was what, knew that everything of religion was a waste, was pointless, was a disesed type thing to exist within the realm of human thought. All religion's are wrong and honour fictional ideas, I rather follow the commandments of Fairy Tales, thou shall not build a house from sticks, thou shall not cast away the wolf before he has consumed my grandmother, thou shall--fuck this. Bottom line, if I declare myself to follow that type of religion, I'll be considered unhinged but honouring a man in the sky is perfectly acceptable.
Let the world be a realm of science, free of religious ideas of fearing a god--get this--loves us so much to have so many bad things happen to good people. Enjoy your one sided relationship, where you're the beaten housewife and he's acts completely free of guilt while--and get this again--loves you very much to keep you on the strainght and narrow.

