A bit more writing and a bit less ‘debating’?

Published by: Barry Walsh on 18th Aug 2011 | View all blogs by Barry Walsh
images.jpeg 

This is a site essentially about writing. The clue is in the title. I’ve personally found the Cloud and its  members hugely helpful to me as my writing has developed. It is also as good a social networking site as any I’ve come across.

The Cloud’s key joys are that a) we can talk of what we will and b) that we meet, virtually, a wonderful range of characters who offer a fantastic variety of writing and life experience. 

As one Clouder has already said, for writers any subject is a legitimate subject for discussion. However, I wonder if things might be getting out of balance. There are plenty of sites on which those who know they’re right (or that others are wrong) can do their blogging dance of the deaf with those who disagree on politics, religion etc. And where, if they wish, they can indulge the bad manners of attacking the person rather than what he or she has written.

This may be good ‘cut and thrust’ but it’s ultimately unsatisfying — can anyone remember a single Clouder’s view changing as a result of the rather bitter exchanges we’ve witnessed recently? This may be because changing someone’s viewpoint may not have been the aim. It often appeared more like a wish simply to defeat someone or have the last word.

How different it is when it’s about our writing. Time after time, my views of what I’m trying to write have changed partially or completely when others have been good enough to read and offer comments. 

Most of us joined, in part at least, to improve our writing and to offer mutual support to other writers. Subjects, such as politics and religion are hugely important but I suggest that as writers, we try to illustrate how they impact our lives and the lives of others through our writing. Or by creating stories to make our arguments (the moral tale can still be a great read). As writers, we might get more from it than we do from doing what we can all manage rather too easily, namely rehearsing our inflexible opinions in public.

Enough! I’ve already gone on too long. 

Comments

40 Comments

  • Amarantha
    by Amarantha 9 months ago
    You are so right, Pimlico Kid. It is a problem that many of us have passionate views and they not only colour our fiction but spill over into the social networking on the Cloud. I think that most writers feel they have something of value to say: we want to change the world don't we?

    For me, I care that there are children among Clouders. Young minds are impressionable and much of the doom-laden dogma we see posted is sending them a message of despair. There's too much of that on other networking sites and in times like these, young people need encouragement and hope.
  • Ron Blanco
    by Ron Blanco 9 months ago
    PK, I think the blogs add richness to the site. They're certainly a great source of inspiration for my writing.

    There have been countless times when people have tried to end a blog, or ban certain subjects. The question I would ask is: why can't people just avoid a blog if they don't wish to get involved?
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 9 months ago
    I'm afraid I'm one of those who tries to avoid polemic blogs; I know I'll get all hot and bothered, I won't change anyone's mind by shouting louder and doubt that anyone will change mine. If I'm being battered over the head with an opinion, it just entrenches me further in my own - which might not be the best position, I know, and I hate that too because it closes my mind (and raises my blood pressure).
    I don't support censorship - people can talk about whatever they want to and if no one else is interested, the blog disappears in the undergrowth very soon; but if it gets nasty and personal and disrespectful, I wonder. When the heavy guns come out, others stay away in droves. I sometimes think there's too much talking and not enough listening. Or too much telling and not enough showing.
    This isn't directed at any particular blog, btw - there have been many over the years and as I say, I don't read them once they start kicking off because I find it too painful; the few lines that appear on the front page give me enough of an idea of what's going on.
    On the flip side, watching how they pan out does give insight into human nature and relationships!
  • Weens
    by Weens 9 months ago
    I'm the sort of person that will put down how I feel about it, and then that's it, unless someone really gets my goat, which I'm glad to say has never happened on here. Ther are a few people on here, like Whisks and Tony, who are always the voice of reason and are catalysts in calming things down. But I say each to their own, if you don't like the blogs, don't comment. Some people really enjoy getting into a debate. I do agree that this is primarily a writing site, and I think Amarantha has a point about our younger members. 'Nuff said. I've had my twopenneth worth.
  • AlanP
    by AlanP 9 months ago
    Blogging about current affairs is a psuedo form of journalism, which is certainly writing so I think it has a legitmate place on here. Overall I am of the Weens/CW school. I will say what I think and try to not be drawn in when commentary becomes an argument. I don't enjoy that one little bit and I do know of a couple of folk who have been so discouraged by them that they have left us. I have been known to appeal for calm, but I don't do that any longer. As CW, I just leave them to it.

    Anyway, back to work for me. Bills to pay.
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 9 months ago
    Having said all that, I do sympathise with Pim's view; there have been times when things have got so unpleasant that I've considered leaving. But then I wait a while and the season's changed again. At least we're not as horrid to each other as some sites (yet) and the storm abates before it gets too litigious.
    I'm all for good manners and as Pim says, 'showing' your views through a thought-provoking story well-told, can be more effective in swaying people to your point of view than any amount of thumping. And I like the initial cartoon. And the 'dance of the deaf' :)
  • Tony
    by Tony 9 months ago
    I tend towards agreement with PK (at the risk of sounding a hypocrite), but I do find it very difficult not to offer some very obvious (to me) alternative viewpoint when someone has posted a pedantic invective that appears to allow for no contradiction. It can be a terrible waste of time, though, apart from anything else. Of course, in other cases, people put forward reasonable and sensible views, which may not necessarily coincide with my own and it can be stimulating for all involved to have other possibilities raised and discussed, civilly, which often happens. As far as the few who sometimes can't seem to restrict themselves to discussing the issues without making either veiled or often quite open detrimental comments about personalities - whether politicians (for example), or fellow writers on the thread - well, that sort of writing simply undermines anything else they may have said, which might possibley have been worth considering. But I find it difficult to give much credence to someone when they write in such a vein. I like Whisk's idea of just reading the 'headlines' on the front page. Must try that.
  • Gerry
    by Gerry 9 months ago
    There are quite a few Clouders I chat to on Facebook and some, I know, have deleted their profiles here. I wonder if that has anything to do with the issues mentioned above.
  • Spangles
    by Spangles 9 months ago
    One of the many reasons why I love the Cloud is because it offers something for everyone and, for the vast majority of the time, we all get along with one another just fine. In common with some other Cloudies who have commented here, I pick and choose the discussions that I get involved in quite carefully. Some totally are over my head (such as the heavy scientific ones - you what?), some have no relevance to me (for instance, anything involving fantasy, vampires or SF leaves me cold but I'm quite happy for everyone else to discuss it to their hearts' content), others seem to be emanating red-alert signals that tell me a punch-up is about to take place so I steer well clear, and some get me thinking. From my perspective as predominantly a writer of non-fiction, it's good practice for me to try to present my thoughts in a coherent way. I have sometimes found that my opinions about something are not quite what I thought they were, once I start writing them down. And sometimes I have reconsidered my original opinion about something after reading someone else's thoughts on that subject.

    I agree with Ron that we can all avoid certain blogs if we don't fancy them. But what upsets me about some of these discussions, and makes me back away from them pronto (in common with others who've mentioned it here), is when they get personal and the Cloudy equivalent of two people squaring up to each other outside a pub after closing time. Because then the antagonism seems to spread all over the Cloud like a, um, cloud.

    I must add, though, that I have even seen critiques of someone's work degenerate into a slanging match and name-calling, so quite honestly I don't think any area of the Cloud can be relied upon to be completely peaceful and rational.

    Fantastic cartoon, by the way!
  • Bren
    by Bren 9 months ago
    I am glad I have missed the slanging matches and name calling - I don't understand why people do that on cloud.
    Good question Pim, and lots of worthy clouders have given replies that I agree with. But, as writers, it is not only any subject that is suitable for us to read, it is our reactions to those topics that is as important. How can we write about anything or anyone if we are not aware.
    This is a writing site and there are places to discuss that - aren't blogs meant to be personal? Are we expected to only write about the rejection slips, the agents or how our writing is going? It would get very boring.
    There have been some very funny blogd, moving ones and annoying ones, just like life. Hopefully if we ignore the unpleasant people they will go away.
    The children who join Cloud are usually very well read, and are talented writers. I too care, like Amarantha about the children and would hope that cloud could be a site that gives encouragement and hope - they are more likely to be published than me.....:)
  • Skylark
    by Skylark 9 months ago
    Agree with most of what's been written already. I wouldn't censor the blogs as such but it would be much more interesting and stimulating if we had a kind of "fact to fiction" blog to comment on and then you could also receive constructive criticism on your writing rather than just getting a thumping because your POV doesn't match someone elses. I certainly don't see the point in getting personal, flinging assumptions around and generally being obnoxious. I try to avoid the blogs where that happens but sometimes find it's impossible to leave it when I feel that something has to be said. Probably not the best policy. Rule number 1 in classroom management is ignore the bad (when possible), highlight the good - hard to put into practice but it does work ;-)
  • Vanessa
    by Vanessa 9 months ago
    Adding to the discussion, the only thing I would like is for people giving a critique to bother looking at the persons age. Several times, I have seen the usual people on the critique page give negative feedback to 13/ 14 ear olds...and be rude about it. Surely, there is a way to make this stop. Either, prevent children of that age from joining or have a way to protect them. The current system, does not work...and will only put yound people off this site. I have to admit that I considered leaving recently, when some members on the cloud were, well, unreasonable. But, I'll hang in their for now...

    Can I just add that no one is an expert...we are all here to learn, published or unpublished ...

    Happy writing, clouders :)
  • Weens
    by Weens 9 months ago
    What Islander8 said.
  • Vanessa
    by Vanessa 9 months ago
    And the clouders are at it again, now someone is accusing another writer of lying about who they are and their age, when will this stop...intervention please, powers that be! :). Refer to critique section!
  • Bren
    by Bren 9 months ago
    Where are they doing that? I agree with all you say.
  • Barry Walsh
    by Barry Walsh 9 months ago
    Thanks for everyone's comments. I'm sorry that some have inferred that I want to ban or censor blogs when I intended no such thing, only that we think about what we put in them.
  • Noodledoodle
    by Noodledoodle 9 months ago
    PK didn't read it that way, but agree that this is not a political platform. Just to pick up on one earlier point re age, I8 has a most valid point, but to add to that one young clouder was asking to meet up - yes meet up with a much older male clouder who, I felt dealt with the request superbly. Scary stuff. Just reaching for the kevlar ;-)
  • Guero Davila
    by Guero Davila 9 months ago
    ND, I saw that request too, and wondered... Perhaps a genuine proposal to the site administrators might be for a secure area to be set up for younger users? My own daughter (10) keeps asking to join the Cloud and keeps getting the same answer - No, it's inappropriate. In fact, maybe something like a younger area could even get sponsorship to aid with set up costs? The readers and writers of the future with Puffin books, or something? Certainly for those, say, under 15?
  • Old Fat Prop
    by Old Fat Prop 9 months ago
    PK, good timely blog.
    Blogs of various content are here to enjoy or ignore at our discernment as Spangles pointed out. After the great editing event on the norwegian blog, I told myself that I would ignore the contentious ones and sit on my hands...


    That lasted a week or so, With any group as diverse as this one has to be. we find a wide variety of experiences and opinions to play with.

    I find some posts irresistable and respond to the provocation in kind.

    Some who I have crossed words with I have ended up respecting much more after the discourse. Others, the opposite.


    Terry, AlanP, Both Mikes, Ron blanco, have posted astonishingly sage and valid points which have allowed me to introspect and reconsider my first impression of them and the points they make.

    Others, the opposite.

    I hope the debates continue to stimilate, annoy, insult and provoke us into thinking things other than our normal thoughts.


    ..and as Ron Blanco said, inspire us to create that which we might not have.....

    Orf to the Duck and Dive for a few jars of scrumpy, a laugh and some great conversation with some friends and ghosts.....


    Tres Dull to some....Reason du etre for others......


    Prop
  • Tenacityflux
    by Tenacityflux 9 months ago
    Good point - though I have my doubts as to how one could police the ages of people who are on the cloud - we only have what we all say to go on after all, I am in fact 105!
  • CJ
    by CJ 9 months ago
    Just to echo what Islander says; I too have witnessed children being torn down by people old enough to be their grandparents, and that left a very nasty taste in my mouth. I have also witnessed people quite legitimately question the wisdom of critique being given (the advice given was not suitable for their genre or the target audience) and watched as the critiquer (and sometimes those around them) then descend into what basically amounted to a 'how dare you question my right to tear your work to shreds!' rant, which I feel helps no one, and even makes me question the actual motivation of the person critiquing (is it to help, or to tear someone down / feel superior?), which is terrible, because this is after all a writing site!. And yes, it has put me off posting anything for critique for a while, and, like Islander, I have considered packing it in, and am dismayed that a lot of people I considered friends have seemingly left. There are a lot of people who used to have accounts here that I miss... :(

    As for the blogs - I tend to steer clear of the more political ones on the whole. If I can feel the blood pressure rise, I delete what I have written and walk away - life is simply too short.
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 9 months ago
    The terms and conditions of us all signing up to the WordCloud stipulate that we have to be 18 or over to join. You can't police it - people can make up whatever age they like. And besides, it's open to free view on the internet. So the age thing is meaningless. I don't think we should moderate our posts just because a baby might be listening, we should moderate them out of respect for each other and the kind of world we want to live in. With that caveat, say what you mean and mean what you say. And if you can't take it, don't dish it.
    Looking forward to another pleasant season on the Cloud. It always comes around again, however bleak it may seem at the time. I've made some jolly good friends and learnt some jolly good things. On balance, it's a plus in my life.
  • Weens
    by Weens 9 months ago
    and mine, and when I'm doing a course, I miss it like hell!
  • Spangles
    by Spangles 9 months ago
    And mine! Whisks makes an excellent point about age and about free view on the internet. And about respecting one another.
  • RichardB
    by RichardB 9 months ago
    I admit I've been away from here for a month or two, and may have missed some nasty moments, but my impression has always been that, compared to many places on the internet, the Cloud is quite astonishingly civilised. I guess it's because of those high standards that the occasional bit of unpleasantness stands out like a sore thumb.

    Nothing is ever perfect, but cheer up, people: it could be a hell of a lot worse.
  • Nibs
    by Nibs 9 months ago
    Great Cartoon PK, and good subject.
    Scanning through some of the comments above I'm sad to read that some youngsters have had a bit of a roasting regards to their work. (I've obviously missed them) I've never looked at ages on this site. People are people.

    I know this site requests that you be 18 or over to join but it's a writing site and I for one am quite happy for youngsters to join. (young in mind or young in age, makes no odds to me).

    I find this cloud world is a family that loves, bickers, lets loose it's fury on subjects sometimes but a choppy sea soon settles and tornado's and thunderstorms soon blow themselves out - eventually. But always loves again.

    I continue to learn so much from this site. Reading others thoughts and opinions helps me create more rounded charactors where I have difficulty. I've usually had very good critique from fellow clouders who've taken the trouble to read my help requests and point out what I'm doing wrong so that I've been able to try and put it right.

    Yes, I agree, this place is one of the most civilised I've visited. I also agree that due to it's naturally high standards, the odd bickering stands out more.

    Love
    Nibs
    :o)
  • trafalgar
    by trafalgar 9 months ago
    Well, whoever s/he was, and however old they were (she claimed to be 13 in her profile) Katie has gone. Sadly, I feel like following her/him/them.
  • Kaz
    by Kaz 9 months ago
    Personally, I'm not sorry that Katie has gone, not that I had anything against her, by the way. But I did read her comment to another asking to meet and my stomach churned. And yes, that person handled it beautifully. But what if it was someone else and they hadn't? She seemed very niave and not open to criticism which let's frigging face it, who would be at 13? My only wish is that if she really is 13 yr old Katie, she will not be so open on other social sites and, if she is not 13 yr old Katie, then I hope I never meet them in person one day.
  • Tenacityflux
    by Tenacityflux 9 months ago
    I am sorry that Katie has left the cloud, but I was rather wary of her all the same - she clearly was not 13 as she wrote on another thread about spending her late teens in an asylum and then having a series of difficult relationships in her twenties, which would indicate that she was not as she claimed to be. I don't care if one wants to create a persona btw, we all do to an extent as we only reveal what we chose too. I think that her pretending to be so young might have been a defense mechanism, but it also makes we wonder about her/his? motives in other areas.
    But hey, I don't think I have seen crits where the comments have gotten personal, even if the blogs have; but then if we ever manage to publish, we will no doubt have to face the slings and arrows of literary critics who are paid to be smart - so perhaps we should just see this as another lesson to be learned on the cloud.
  • Skylark
    by Skylark 9 months ago
    Well, I admit to being totally flumoxed. I came across Katie the day before yesterday and posted a critique on some writing she posted. It seemed very 13-year-old in style and her response was brief but polite. I was about to go and add to the critique tonight until I saw this blog on the homepage saying her profile was deleted. As usual, have no idea what's gone or going on! :-S
  • Tenacityflux
    by Tenacityflux 9 months ago
    I agree her writing style was very 13 year old, but I read quite a lot of it and after a while, things did seem out of place not so much in the style but the content and concerns it expressed - and although this may now mark me out as a bitch of the highest order - I wonder if her choice of age was chosen to match her writing, and perhaps soften the response to some of it's short comings?
  • JtF
    by JtF 9 months ago
    So was it real or was it Memorex??!
    If I'm contributing my time to under cover 'agents' or trolls I'm out of here too
  • CJ
    by CJ 9 months ago
    As someone who teaches 13 year old girls English, I would say her style, reactions and yes, even content (I know she was trying to write stuff most of us would consider inappropriate for her age, but I know from experience that they're near enough all at it at that age. In fact, she seemed pretty tame to me - google 'yaoi', something seemingly dominated by 13 - 16 year old girls, and you'll see what I mean) rang true to me...
  • Tenacityflux
    by Tenacityflux 9 months ago
    It was her 'real' life comments which made me question her age, but hell, she's gone now - maybe she'll return in a new form when she is in a happier place.
  • Caducean Whisks
    by Caducean Whisks 9 months ago
    Since that saga won't die, can I just speak in her defence? Many new joiners end up being '13 years old'. I don't know if it's a blip of the Cloud or what, but if the person doesn't spot it - or know how to amend it - there they stay like Peter Pan, at 13. Need not mean anything sinister.
  • Weens
    by Weens 9 months ago
    Even if she was older than thirteen, we should treat everyone in a way that we would like to be treated ourselves. Yes, critiques aren't always good news, but there are two ways of putting everything. We should never make any one feel 'attacked'.
  • Dan
    by Dan 9 months ago
    Irony (n.): incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result. E.g. a blog post named 'A bit more writing and a bit less ‘debating’?' receiving 34 comments.
  • Weens
    by Weens 9 months ago
    Actually Dan, you are right. I'd never thought of that.
  • Spangles
    by Spangles 9 months ago
    When you sign up for the Cloud, the default setting for the date of birth is January 1 1998. So if you leave that untouched, the Cloud will think you are 13 years old.
  • Tony
    by Tony 9 months ago
    That's very misleading. Couldn't we get Big Chief Cumulus to have it altered? There's been a lot of wasted time and effort here, trying to be ultra tactful to a young child (although perhaps the person needed that amount of tact anyway).
Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up now.